From: "Lukáš Doktor" <ldoktor@redhat.com>
To: Amador Pahim <apahim@redhat.com>, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
kwolf@redhat.com, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com,
Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] qemu.py: fix is_running()
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:34:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7550b799-e417-5dac-40b6-d2207fc9d5d2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALAZnb3W+NnjKafbmZ1Bn77Dm=YqfkVDKinz+VU2BF7D-x-7mA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7800 bytes --]
Dne 20.7.2017 v 22:14 Amador Pahim napsal(a):
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:49 PM, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 05:09:11PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Amador Pahim <apahim@redhat.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> Amador Pahim <apahim@redhat.com> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Current implementation is broken. It does not really test if the child
>>>>>> process is running.
>>>>>
>>>>> What usage exactly is broken by this? Got a reproducer for me?
>>>>
>>>> Problem is that 'returncode' is not set without a calling
>>>> poll()/wait()/communicate(), so it's only useful to test if the
>>>> process is running after such calls. But if we use 'poll()' instead,
>>>> it will, according to the docs, "Check if child process has
>>>> terminated. Set and return returncode attribute."
>>>>
>>>> Reproducer is:
>>>>
>>>> >>> import subprocess
>>>> >>> devnull = open('/dev/null', 'rb')
>>>> >>> p = subprocess.Popen(['qemu-system-x86_64', '-broken'],
>>>> stdin=devnull, stdout=devnull, stderr=devnull, shell=False)
>>>> >>> print p.returncode
>>>> None
>>>> >>> print p.poll()
>>>> 1
>>>> >>> print p.returncode
>>>> 1
>>>>
>>>>>> The Popen.returncode will only be set after by a poll(), wait() or
>>>>>> communicate(). If the Popen fails to launch a VM, the Popen.returncode
>>>>>> will not turn to None by itself.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm. What is the value of .returncode then?
>>>>
>>>> returncode starts with None and becomes the process exit code when the
>>>> process is over and one of that three methods is called (poll(),
>>>> wait() or communicate()).
>>>>
>>>> There's an error in my description though. The correct would be: "The
>>>> Popen.returncode will only be set after a call to poll(), wait() or
>>>> communicate(). If the Popen fails to launch a VM, the Popen.returncode
>>>> will not turn from None to the actual return code by itself."
>>>
>>> Suggest to add ", and is_running() continues to report True".
>>>
>>>>>> Instead of using Popen.returncode, let's use Popen.poll(), which
>>>>>> actually checks if child process has terminated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Amador Pahim <apahim@redhat.com>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> scripts/qemu.py | 2 +-
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/scripts/qemu.py b/scripts/qemu.py
>>>>>> index 880e3e8219..f0fade32bd 100644
>>>>>> --- a/scripts/qemu.py
>>>>>> +++ b/scripts/qemu.py
>>>>>> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ class QEMUMachine(object):
>>>>>> raise
>>>>>>
>>>>>> def is_running(self):
>>>>>> - return self._popen and (self._popen.returncode is None)
>>>>>> + return self._popen and (self._popen.poll() is None)
>>>>>>
>>
>> After re-reading shutdown(), I think this is _not_ OK: if
>> is_running() return False before we call .wait(), we will never
>> load the log file or run _post_shutdown() if QEMU exits between
>> the launch() and shutdown() calls.
>
> Yes, I just noticed that while cleaning up the code.
>
>>
>> Yes, it's fragile.
>>
>> The root problem on both launch() and shutdown() seems to be
>> coupling the external "is QEMU running?" state with the internal
>> "did we load the log file and ran _post_shutdown() already?"
>> state.
>>
>> I see two possible approaches for this:
>>
>> 1) Benefit from the fact that the internal Popen state will not
>> change under our feet unless we explicitly call
>> poll()/wait()/etc, and keep the existing code. (Not my
>> favorite option)
>>
>> 2) Rewrite the code so that we don't depend on the subtle Popen
>> internal state rules, and track our own internal state in
>> a QEMUMachine attribute. e.g.:
>
> +1 for this approach. I'm working on something similar, thanks for the
> detailed "e.g." code here.
>
>>
>> def _handle_shutdown(self):
>> '''Load log file and call _post_shutdown() hook if necessary'''
>> # Must be called only after QEMU actually exited.
>> assert not self.is_running()
>> if self._shutdown_pending:
>> if self.exitcode() < 0:
>> sys.stderr.write('qemu received signal %i: %s\n' % (-exitcode, ' '.join(self._args)))
>> self._load_io_log()
>> self._post_shutdown()
>> self._shutdown_pending = False
>>
>> def _terminate(self):
>> '''Terminate QEMU if it's still running'''
>> if self.is_running():
>> try:
>> self._qmp.cmd('quit')
>> self._qmp.close()
>> except:
>> self._popen.kill()
>> self._popen.wait()
>>
>> def _launch(self):
>> '''Launch the VM and establish a QMP connection'''
>> devnull = open('/dev/null', 'rb')
>> qemulog = open(self._qemu_log_path, 'wb')
>> self._shutdown_pending = True
>> self._pre_launch()
>> args = self._wrapper + [self._binary] + self._base_args() + self._args
>> self._popen = subprocess.Popen(args, stdin=devnull, stdout=qemulog,
>> stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, shell=False)
>> self._post_launch()
>>
>> def launch(self):
>> try:
>> self._launch()
>> except:
>> self._terminate()
>> self._handle_shutdown()
>> raise
>>
>> def shutdown(self):
>> '''Terminate the VM and clean up'''
>> self._terminate()
>> self._handle_shutdown()
>>
This part also caught my attention and I also meant to improve it when this series is merged. Anyway let's state my suggestions here, take it or let it go:
1. `get_log` should check whether `self._iolog` is `None` and then it should check for process status
2. the `self._iolog` is `None` is the indication whether `shutdown` was called or not (not whether the process exists or not)
3. add `__del__` to cleanup in case one forgets to call `shutdown` (currently the files and processes are left behind)
4. use `name = "qemu-%d-%d" % (os.getpid(), id(self))` to allow multiple instances with default name at the same time.
Also I just realized that even with just this patch (as is) files/processes can be left behind:
>>> import qemu, os
>>> a=qemu.QEMUMachine("/usr/bin/qemu-kvm", debug=True)
>>> a.launch()
QMP:>>> {'execute': 'qmp_capabilities'}
QMP:<<< {u'return': {}}
>>> a.is_running()
False
>>> a.shutdown()
>>> os.path.exists(a._qemu_log_path)
True
Before this patch it worked well as (as Eduardo mentioned) the `is_running` was tracing internal state, not the process state.
Regards,
Lukáš
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>>
>>>>>> def exitcode(self):
>>>>>> if self._popen is None:
>>>>> return None
>>>>> return self._popen.returncode
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is this one safe?
>>>>
>>>> Here it's used just to retrieve the value from the Popen.returncode.
>>>> It's not being used to check whether the process is running or not.
>>>
>>> If self._popen is not None, we return self._popen.returncode. It's None
>>> if .poll() etc. haven't been called. Can this happen? If not, why not?
>>> If yes, why is returning None then okay?
>>
>> It can't happen because the only caller of exitcode()
>> (device-crash-test) calls it immediately after shutdown(). But
>> it would be nice to make exitcode() behavior consistent with
>> is_running().
>>
>> --
>> Eduardo
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 502 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-21 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-20 9:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] scripts/qemu.py small fixes Amador Pahim
2017-07-20 9:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] qemu.py: fix is_running() Amador Pahim
2017-07-20 11:49 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-07-20 12:57 ` Amador Pahim
2017-07-20 15:09 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-07-20 15:46 ` Amador Pahim
2017-07-20 17:49 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-07-20 20:14 ` Amador Pahim
2017-07-21 7:34 ` Lukáš Doktor [this message]
2017-07-20 9:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] qemu.py: include debug information on launch error Amador Pahim
2017-07-20 11:58 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-07-20 13:14 ` Amador Pahim
2017-07-20 14:43 ` Eduardo Habkost
2017-07-20 15:51 ` Amador Pahim
2017-07-20 15:01 ` Markus Armbruster
2017-07-20 15:50 ` Amador Pahim
2017-07-20 9:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] qemu.py: make 'args' public Amador Pahim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7550b799-e417-5dac-40b6-d2207fc9d5d2@redhat.com \
--to=ldoktor@redhat.com \
--cc=apahim@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).