From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: tpm2@lists.01.org, "Kenneth Goldman" <kgoldman@us.ibm.com>,
"Chris Friesen" <chris.friesen@windriver.com>,
"Qi, Yadong" <yadong.qi@intel.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Xu, Quan" <quan.xu@intel.com>,
"Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Choosing PCR banks for swtpm's TPM 2
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:08:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <759e2eab-bc8a-a841-5016-4308c3a680bb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180625155933.GK18580@redhat.com>
On 06/25/2018 11:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:56:24AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> On 06/25/2018 11:25 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 11:05:55AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> I am sending this email to solicit input on the choice of the PCR banks to
>>>> enable for swtpm's TPM 2. I have currently enabled 4 PCR banks for
>>>> SHA{1,256,384,512}. The downside of this is that running the TPM 2 with so
>>>> many PCR banks has a performance impact when the Linux integrity measurement
>>>> architecture is used and has to extend measurements into all PCR banks,
>>>> which Linux does already.
>>>>
>>>> TPM 2 has the PCR_Allocate() command for a user to select the PCR banks to
>>>> use. This command allows to make some PCR banks invisible. The change has to
>>>> be done through the firmware and has the downside that the TPM2 does not
>>>> support TPM2_Shutdown(SU_STATE) after this command was used. This prevents
>>>> suspend/resume from working properly. So, it seems that one shouldn't have
>>>> to use this command, which in turn means the number of PCR banks should be
>>>> small.
>>>>
>>>> Another complication with the swtpm is the upgrade path. Suspended VMs will
>>>> expect that the PCR banks that were available before the suspend will be
>>>> available after the resume and a possible swtpm upgrade. This in turn means
>>>> that the PCR banks should be chosen now and we'll have to stick with them.
>>> Anything that has a risk of needing to change between versions would need
>>> to be tied into the machine type in some way.
>> You mean a machine type like q35? I am not sure how it would be tied into
>> QEMU since the swtpm command line options are chosen more or less
>> independently of the ones from QEMU.
> Yes, each QEMU release introduces a new versioned machine type eg
> q35-2.10, q35-2.11, q35-2.12, q35-3.0
>
> If anything in QEMU changes which impacts live migraiton/save/restore/etc
> then we tie it to the versioned machine type. so q35-3.0 would get the
> new default value, and all previous machine types keep the old default
> value.
>
> For this to be possible with externally launched swtpm though, would
> require some way for QEMU to talk to swtpm to tell it what default
> to use for this. I don't know enough about swtpm to have an idea how
> practical this is or not.
The set of PCR banks a future TPM 2 would be 'manufactured with' would
be determined by parameters to swtpm_setup. That's when the TPM2 is
'manufactured' and the certificates are created and written into its
NVRAM locations. QEMU is not talking to the TPM 2 at this point. So it
would be parameters passed from libvirt to swtpm_setup that determine
the set of PCR banks. swtpm itself would get those supplied via command
line options when invoked by swtpm_setup. If one was to skip over the
swtpm_setup step, then why not use the swtpm command line options that
need to be there for swtpm_setup support. Though I think few people will
use it like that. I would not extend the protocol for this purpose.
Stefan
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-25 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-25 15:05 [Qemu-devel] Choosing PCR banks for swtpm's TPM 2 Stefan Berger
2018-06-25 15:18 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-06-25 15:22 ` Stefan Berger
2018-06-25 15:29 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-06-25 15:54 ` Stefan Berger
2018-06-25 16:11 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-06-25 16:23 ` Stefan Berger
2018-06-25 15:25 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-25 15:56 ` Stefan Berger
2018-06-25 15:59 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-25 16:08 ` Stefan Berger [this message]
2018-06-25 16:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2018-06-25 16:15 ` Stefan Berger
2018-06-25 19:44 ` Stefan Berger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=759e2eab-bc8a-a841-5016-4308c3a680bb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=chris.friesen@windriver.com \
--cc=kgoldman@us.ibm.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quan.xu@intel.com \
--cc=tpm2@lists.01.org \
--cc=yadong.qi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).