From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56903) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eeUlc-0005AM-DZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:47:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eeUlb-00027b-JA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:47:44 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-x22e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22e]:42535) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eeUlb-00026u-C7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:47:43 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id b25so4389698pfd.9 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 15:47:43 -0800 (PST) References: <1514940265-18093-1-git-send-email-mjc@sifive.com> <1514940265-18093-7-git-send-email-mjc@sifive.com> <14dcf85d-a8e0-fc21-df46-b94fe48d1067@linaro.org> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <75ba8c40-803f-4652-93d9-852c97334aad@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 15:47:39 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 06/21] RISC-V FPU Support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jim Wilson Cc: Michael Clark , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Bastian Koppelmann , Sagar Karandikar , RISC-V Patches On 01/24/2018 10:58 AM, Jim Wilson wrote: > I think that qemu is correct here, and that you want to use float32_chs. Ok. > Although, looking at this again, I see another statement in a > different place that says: > > Except when otherwise stated, if the result of a floating-point operation is > NaN, it is the canonical NaN. The canonical NaN has a positive sign and all > significand bits clear except the MSB, a.k.a. the quiet bit. For > single-precision floating-point, this corresponds to the pattern > 0x7fc00000. Yes, I had read this before as well. I had assumed that your patch constituted an intended change to this text. > This could take a little time to sort out. Ok. I don't see this as a blocking issue for merging. r~