From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: Klaus Jensen <its@irrelevant.dk>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hw/block/nvme: fix resource leak in nvme_format_ns
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 11:02:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75eb366b-32d9-ba67-971b-e5993f5ae192@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210322061951.186748-3-its@irrelevant.dk>
On 22.03.21 07:19, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> From: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
>
> In nvme_format_ns(), if the namespace is of zero size (which might be
> useless, but not invalid), the `count` variable will leak. Fix this by
> returning early in that case.
When looking at the Coverity report, something else caught my eye: As
far as I’m aware, blk_aio_pwrite_zeroes() may invoke the CB before
returning (if blk_do_pwritev_part() returns without yielding). I don’t
think that will happen with real hardware (who knows, though), but it
should be possible to see with the null-co block driver.
nvme_format_ns() doesn’t quite look like it takes that into account.
For example, because *count starts at 1 and is decremented after the
while (len) loop, all nvme_aio_format_cb() invocations (if they are
invoked before their blk_aio_pwrite_zeroes() returns) will see
*count == 2, and thus not free it, or call nvme_enqueue_req_completion().
I don’t know whether the latter is problematic, but not freeing `count`
doesn’t seem right. Perhaps this could be addressed by adding a
condition to the `(*count)--` to see whether `(*count)-- == 1` (or
rather `--(*count) == 0`), which would indicate that there are no AIO
functions still in flight?
Max
> Reported-by: Coverity (CID 1451082)
> Fixes: dc04d25e2f3f ("hw/block/nvme: add support for the format nvm command")
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
> ---
> hw/block/nvme.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/block/nvme.c b/hw/block/nvme.c
> index 6842b01ab58b..dad275971a84 100644
> --- a/hw/block/nvme.c
> +++ b/hw/block/nvme.c
> @@ -4984,6 +4984,11 @@ static uint16_t nvme_format_ns(NvmeCtrl *n, NvmeNamespace *ns, uint8_t lbaf,
> ns->status = NVME_FORMAT_IN_PROGRESS;
>
> len = ns->size;
> +
> + if (!len) {
> + return NVME_SUCCESS;
> + }
> +
> offset = 0;
>
> count = g_new(int, 1);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-22 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-22 6:19 [PATCH 0/2] hw/block/nvme: coverity fixes Klaus Jensen
2021-03-22 6:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] hw/block/nvme: fix resource leak in nvme_dif_rw Klaus Jensen
2021-03-22 6:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] hw/block/nvme: fix resource leak in nvme_format_ns Klaus Jensen
2021-03-22 10:02 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2021-03-22 10:48 ` Klaus Jensen
2021-03-22 11:06 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75eb366b-32d9-ba67-971b-e5993f5ae192@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=its@irrelevant.dk \
--cc=k.jensen@samsung.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).