From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3mh7-0000ol-TR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:42:02 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3mh6-0000mN-5p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:42:01 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56990 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K3mh5-0000m5-Pe for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:41:59 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.241]:47205) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K3mh5-00068G-Q9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:41:59 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so1550412rvb.22 for ; Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:41:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <761ea48b0806032341h418e935id0a816d0d4d2686a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 08:41:58 +0200 From: "Laurent Desnogues" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Suggestion for testing framework In-Reply-To: <20080603223507.GB25242@networkno.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <767386.58386.qm@web57006.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <200806032302.09778.paul@codesourcery.com> <5d6222a80806031505t15f18fe7u256514ccbdc9960@mail.gmail.com> <200806032325.02120.paul@codesourcery.com> <20080603223507.GB25242@networkno.de> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > OTOH, something like the CRIS testsuite (which was ported from GNU sim) > for other target architectures could be very useful. That would certainly be something very valuable but it would need a tremendous amount of work and would have to be done by a different person than the original coder (or else you could not catch misunderstandings of the instruction descriptions for instance). I would also like to point out that non ia32/x86_64 targets tests were not covered by the discussion. This probably represents a small percentage of qemu usage, but it definitely needs some kind of automated testing too. Laurent