From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K5KQE-0006yN-B0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 08:54:58 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K5KQC-0006xe-PN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 08:54:57 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59240 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K5KQC-0006xX-EV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 08:54:56 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.244]:38416) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K5KQC-00052Z-1t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 08:54:56 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so1583212rvb.22 for ; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 05:54:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <761ea48b0806080554x4b8ca2e9o6b279fae72c357e9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:54:54 +0200 From: "Laurent Desnogues" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] Buggy wfi support for ARM user Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org The wfi instruction for user mode ARM results in: qemu: unhandled CPU exception 0x10001 - aborting I propose that for user mode this instruction be considered as a NOP. Any thoughts? Laurent