From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KBaEY-0001sH-4I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:00:46 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KBaEW-0001rM-JN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:00:45 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48696 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KBaEV-0001rH-VS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:00:44 -0400
Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.247]:24038)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1KBaEV-0000BA-HE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:00:43 -0400
Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so7831127rvb.22
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <761ea48b0806251200y350f569dy9b1ea9089bb67b41@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:00:42 +0200
From: "Laurent Desnogues" <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix wrong destination register for
	smuad, smusd, smlad, smlsd
In-Reply-To: <200806251827.37618.paul@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <761ea48b0806230240h31745caaj24e9c6f9ce80eea2@mail.gmail.com>
	<200806251758.58313.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<761ea48b0806251015t4088f674hcacbc256b7a6dc0f@mail.gmail.com>
	<200806251827.37618.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> Anyway, are you interested in a patch that corrects enough of
>> v6 instructions that FFmpeg for ARMv6 works?  Would FFmpeg
>> be considered as a good enough test?
>
> I'm generally more interested in the description/explanation of the patches
> themselves.  Saying "FOO works" is nice, but not as nice as convincing me
> that you understand both the code you're changing, the arm architecture, and
> that the two agree :-)

That looks fair :-)  I will submit a patch tomorrow.  Is that
acceptable to submit as a single patch with some text
describing all the updates or should I split it instruction
by instruction?


Laurent