From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KNkqS-0000LR-FY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:46:12 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KNkqR-0000Kh-JP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:46:11 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36925 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KNkqR-0000KZ-CC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:46:11 -0400
Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.242]:19965)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1KNkqR-0005p3-6E
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:46:11 -0400
Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so3490889rvb.22
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <761ea48b0807290146i204b5605vdc505ebb57aace50@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:46:09 +0200
From: "Laurent Desnogues" <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] x86 tcg problem
In-Reply-To: <20080728225136.C26546@stanley.csl.cornell.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20080728225136.C26546@stanley.csl.cornell.edu>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Vince Weaver <vince@csl.cornell.edu> wrote:
>
> I've spent a day now trying to figure out why bzip2 compress/decompress
> doesn't work when using sparc32plus-linux-user on x86.
>
> I've tracked the problem to the Zero flag being improperly set (attached is
> a small exe/src that reproduces the problem.. it reports "Greater"
> on real hardware, "Less Than" on qemu current).

It looks like it works with revision 4963:

./sparc32plus-linux-user/qemu-sparc32plus cmp_test
Less Equal

I guess it's malc commits 4961-2 that fixed it :-)


Laurent