From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KNu0i-0002WX-NE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:33:24 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KNu0i-0002Vl-68
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:33:24 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55941 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KNu0i-0002VL-1R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:33:24 -0400
Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.156]:20598)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1KNu0g-0001Cx-RM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:33:23 -0400
Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 6so1773760ywa.82
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 11:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <761ea48b0807291133o7b7fb9c0l50d37474818c6a65@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:33:20 +0200
From: "Laurent Desnogues" <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] x86 tcg problem
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807292223500.2159@linmac.oyster.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20080728225136.C26546@stanley.csl.cornell.edu>
	<761ea48b0807290146i204b5605vdc505ebb57aace50@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0807292223500.2159@linmac.oyster.ru>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 8:24 PM, malc <av1474@comtv.ru> wrote:
>> I guess it's malc commits 4961-2 that fixed it :-)
>
> THat would have been a miracle since those do not touch x86 parts at all
> :)

Well, hum, is exhaustion enough of an excuse for stupidity? :)


Laurent