From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNvtc-0007VQ-EK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:34:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNvta-0007UH-Sa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:34:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33677 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KNvta-0007U6-Lt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:34:10 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.243]:35678) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KNvta-0005Di-9h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:34:10 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so42363rvb.22 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <761ea48b0807291334v23d4e7f2l915c1c06aa291c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:34:09 +0200 From: "Laurent Desnogues" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] targets that still use dyngen In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:11 PM, malc wrote: > It is harder, also much more tedious and requiring intimate knowlege of > underlying architecture. I would have thought that Alpha is of similar complexity as MIPS, that is less than SPARC, x86 or ARM. Or did you mean that writing a front-end is harder than a TCG target? Laurent