From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KRO8L-0008Cu-6N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:19:41 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KRO8H-000879-MS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:19:38 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53392 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KRO8G-00086j-7T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:19:36 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.245]:57861) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KRO8G-0005z0-Nc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 05:19:36 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so738142rvb.22 for ; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <761ea48b0808080219t301cf126hfa2c11825b1ada7a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:19:34 +0200 From: "Laurent Desnogues" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [4710] Prevent guest reusing host memory allocations. In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Paul Brook wrote: > Revision: 4710 > http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=qemu&revision=4710 > Author: pbrook > Date: 2008-06-09 13:47:45 +0000 (Mon, 09 Jun 2008) > > Log Message: > ----------- > Prevent guest reusing host memory allocations. > > Modified Paths: > -------------- > trunk/Makefile > trunk/Makefile.target > trunk/cutils.c > trunk/exec.c > trunk/linux-user/mmap.c > > Added Paths: > ----------- > trunk/qemu-malloc.c (The above mentioned commit has already been commented. Look in the mailing list archive.) I have found that it breaks alpha user-mode emulation on 64 bit hosts. Has anyone observed that for some other 64 bit target? Also has someone tried to correct that problem? If not I will give this a try. Laurent