From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KgDrL-0001cX-Rl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:23:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KgDrJ-0001cL-G8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:23:26 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35237 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KgDrJ-0001cI-AJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:23:25 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:37335) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KgDrJ-0005QG-Il for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:23:25 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.250]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KgDrH-000229-58 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:23:23 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so3414231rvb.22 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <761ea48b0809180023t37d300ceq790fe33c5ab7602a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:23:20 +0200 From: "Laurent Desnogues" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add futimesat syscall In-Reply-To: <20080918063007.GA26841@kos.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080917194533.GB21187@kos.to> <20080918063007.GA26841@kos.to> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 01:54:21AM +0200, andrzej zaborowski wrote: >> 2008/9/17 Riku Voipio : >> > Add futimes patch, originally from scratchbox qemu devkit. > >> Kirill Shutemov submitted an imlementation of futimensat() at >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-09/msg00439.html , >> it looks cleaner to me. > > Kirill's patch looks good to me. There's a functional difference between Kirill's patch and yours: Kirill + ret = get_errno(futimesat(arg1, p, tvp)); you + ret = get_errno(sys_futimesat(arg1, path(p), tv)); Laurent