From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kmugc-0000Wx-UH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:20:02 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KmugZ-0000QW-1y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:20:02 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42505 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KmugY-0000QE-Lf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:19:58 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.175]:25240) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KmugX-00019G-TI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:19:58 -0400 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so2898489wfd.4 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:19:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <761ea48b0810061119y1d64b16cp4180bfa0b917567c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 20:19:56 +0200 From: "Laurent Desnogues" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] Update qemu-tech.texi, needs verification In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200810061426.54453.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org A small typo: qemu switched to tcg after the release of 0.9.1 and not 0.9.0, didn't it? I also find this wording not satisfying: +TCG operations are then +implemented in the host CPU back end, also known as TCG target What about something like this: TCG operations are then translated into host instructions by the CPU back end, also known as TCG target That's not the whole since we have helpers, but that looks closer to the reality, at least for me :) Laurent