From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KuOX8-00007r-JL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:37:10 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KuOX5-00006P-7j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:37:09 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50578 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KuOX5-00006J-2J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:37:07 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.175]:59842) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KuOX4-0005jv-US for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:37:07 -0400 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so1969029wfd.4 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 02:37:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <761ea48b0810270237g7811a96fpe24bca97c214f5bb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:37:05 +0200 From: "Laurent Desnogues" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] Update disassembler files from latest binutils In-Reply-To: <761ea48b0810270154x2c7c606es13209e2481471b79@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200810250106.50402.paul@codesourcery.com> <761ea48b0810270154x2c7c606es13209e2481471b79@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Laurent Desnogues wrote: > On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Blue Swirl wrote: >> >>> GPLv3 is not acceptable for qemu, which contains v2 only code. >> >> We could update once to binutils 2.17 which is GPL v2+. For Sparc this >> would be about OK, since there is just one commit after GPLv3 switch. >> But for i386 this would mean missing 30 to 50 commits. > > I took a quick look at binutils CVS repository: 2.17 released happened > in June '06. > > According to ChangeLog, the switch to GPLv3 occured in July '07: > http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/opcodes/ChangeLog-2007?rev=1.2&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=src > > So I *guess* getting source out of CVS from June '07 should be safe > license wise, though probably slightly dangerous from a stability point > of view. Perhaps Paul can comment on that? In case it matters, the ARM disassembler is exactly at the point I mentionned: last commit before the switch to GPLv3. Laurent