From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KwFh4-0006Rl-Mh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 08:35:06 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KwFh3-0006Oq-6o
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 08:35:06 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42334 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KwFh3-0006Of-2s
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 08:35:05 -0400
Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.247]:23838)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1KwFh2-00065M-Re
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 08:35:04 -0400
Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so1552191rvb.22
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 05:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <761ea48b0811010535t51088dd5n8362b0b34db48a0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:35:03 +0100
From: "Laurent Desnogues" <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [5592] target-ppc: optimize popcntb
In-Reply-To: <761ea48b0811010529w50904850h41028a811609fefc@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <E1Kw4l8-0001Qe-9E@cvs.savannah.gnu.org>
	<761ea48b0811010529w50904850h41028a811609fefc@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Laurent Desnogues
<laurent.desnogues@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to use builtin's as is done in host-utils.h?

Forget that, I thought it was traditional bit counting.


Laurent