From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L6kyg-0005He-2Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:00:42 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1L6kyd-0005H3-AE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:00:40 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57405 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L6kyc-0005Gq-Tr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:00:39 -0500
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]:40797)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1L6kyc-0006IL-CB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:00:38 -0500
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1473527fgb.8
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:00:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <761ea48b0811300400l6edcc1f6g63261dd8b4629574@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:00:37 +0100
From: "Laurent Desnogues" <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add __noreturn function attribute
In-Reply-To: <49327E37.6050003@weilnetz.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <492FDA5D.6080602@siemens.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0811282031360.2200@linmac.oyster.ru>
	<493030EA.4040405@web.de> <49326633.9020007@redhat.com>
	<49327E37.6050003@weilnetz.de>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Stefan Weil <berlios@weilnetz.de> wrote:
>
> Why do we need a new macro instead of just using __attribute__
> ((__noreturn__))?

Don't we need it to prevent gcc-ism from being all over the code?
Though I wonder how much tcg converted code still depends on
being compiled by gcc.


Laurent