From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LMdzI-0001Ri-N5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:47:00 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LMdzI-0001Qv-8U
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:47:00 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40287 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LMdzI-0001Qm-5Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:47:00 -0500
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:26736)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1LMdzH-0000Bn-KH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:46:59 -0500
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so1896759fgg.8
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:46:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <761ea48b0901122346v37009ea4k2077cba73eb9dfd9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:46:57 +0100
From: "Laurent Desnogues" <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] sh: SE7750 board definition
In-Reply-To: <496BFD30.30306@renesas.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4969B77E.7050206@juno.dti.ne.jp>
	<20090111130445.GA12080@game.jcrosoft.org>
	<496ABD72.20400@juno.dti.ne.jp> <20090112124949.GA14269@linux-sh.org>
	<496BFD30.30306@renesas.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
<iwamatsu.nobuhiro@renesas.com> wrote:
>
> Because first of all, I am not so interested in the support of the board.
> I am interested in emulation of CPU and the userland.
> In the current situation, the number of supported real boards increases
> when the support of CPU increases. The code of the board enters whenever
> CPU is supported.

I agree.  I was very surprised to find last Sunday that a simple instruction
such as FMAC was not implemented.  I wonder how many holes are still
there.


Laurent