From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LR7Lk-0000Wp-Nl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:56:40 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LR7Lk-0000WX-Bo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:56:40 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50822 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LR7Lk-0000WS-3T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:56:40 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.156]:40099) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LR7Lj-0006b4-LF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:56:39 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so3336656fgg.8 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 07:56:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <497C8AF6.8010401@web.de> References: <20090124151035.GA29283@miranda.arrow> <497C8AF6.8010401@web.de> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:56:37 +0100 Message-ID: <761ea48b0901250756g1613d82dr81d89707d8d3dadc@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] build system: Further improve quiet mode (was: Re: [6380] Make make output quieter (Avi Kivity)) From: Laurent Desnogues Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Stuart Brady wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 06:13:09PM +0000, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> Spew out less noise when compiling. This helps review make output for >>> information such as compilation warnings, rather than extra long compiler >>> invocations. >>> >>> The full output can be generated by supplying a 'V=1' parameter to make. >> >> Excellent! >> >> However, I would find it helpful to see the name of the target that is >> being built. Something like the following? ... > > Good idea! I rebased your work over recent changes and adopted it a bit, > see below. Hope you still like it. :) While you're at it, would it be possible to dump C flags once at the beginning to see how things get compiled? :-) Laurent