From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LR81X-00087d-3b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:39:51 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LR81W-00087C-Ft
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:39:50 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43172 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LR81W-000871-0R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:39:50 -0500
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]:47275)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1LR81V-0005Ip-KR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:39:49 -0500
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so3347251fgg.8
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:39:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <497C9398.3060006@web.de>
References: <E1LPhZd-0002lW-DL@cvs.savannah.gnu.org>
	<20090124151035.GA29283@miranda.arrow> <497C8AF6.8010401@web.de>
	<761ea48b0901250756g1613d82dr81d89707d8d3dadc@mail.gmail.com>
	<497C9398.3060006@web.de>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:39:47 +0100
Message-ID: <761ea48b0901250839q52988a55lbf4bfa2535855ad4@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] build system: Further improve quiet mode
From: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> wrote:
> Something like this? I also included LDFLAGS - before someone asks...

Exactly :-) Thanks!


Laurent