From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LRWlP-0005nS-3F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:04:51 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LRWlL-0005lr-Kx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:04:50 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55345 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRWlL-0005lo-Ew
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:04:47 -0500
Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.177]:14508)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1LRWlK-0002VW-Qz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:04:47 -0500
Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c30so1071186ika.2
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:04:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <497DF491.4010808@codemonkey.ws>
References: <E1LPhZd-0002lW-DL@cvs.savannah.gnu.org>
	<20090124151035.GA29283@miranda.arrow> <497C8AF6.8010401@web.de>
	<761ea48b0901250756g1613d82dr81d89707d8d3dadc@mail.gmail.com>
	<497C9398.3060006@web.de> <497DF491.4010808@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 20:04:38 +0100
Message-ID: <761ea48b0901261104n6fb53c4ey2eec105a6f92e569@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] build system: Further improve quiet mode
From: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
>
> BTW, what do people think of printing CFLAGS?  I find it not all that
> exciting but if people like it, I'm happy to go with it.

I'm obviously interested since I asked for it :-)  I often play with -O
flag when I check every target still builds and sometimes I forget to
set it back to -O2 while I need to run the thing.  Having it dumped
early in the build helps me catch when it's wrong as I always look
at the first compilation lines before switching to something else.
Of course it's just a nice-to-have for me, nothing that matters that
much.


Laurent