From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LZojC-0003Ki-PB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:52:50 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LZojB-0003KW-Ch
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:52:50 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41712 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZojB-0003KT-A7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:52:49 -0500
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]:45668)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1LZojA-0007T9-G9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:52:49 -0500
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so843260fga.8
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:52:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <499C2BEF.6010107@gmail.com>
References: <499C03A9.6040003@gmail.com>
	<761ea48b0902180500wbe676d4x3895d37df10e495b@mail.gmail.com>
	<499C0A81.8090106@gmail.com>
	<761ea48b0902180526q1be52725x748c7c14b5d907de@mail.gmail.com>
	<499C2BEF.6010107@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:52:47 +0100
Message-ID: <761ea48b0902180752p2e665a07vbb922fb6621a7173@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Monitor Memory Accesses
From: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Andrea Pellegrini
<andrea.pellegrini@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the file linux-user/mmap.c, which is the difference between the two
> following lines? Does the first one provide the virtual address while the
> second one is already translated in the real address?
>
>       p = mmap(g2h(mmap_start),
>                host_len, prot, flags | MAP_FIXED, fd, host_offset);
>
>       p = mmap(real_start ? g2h(real_start) : NULL,
>                host_len, prot, flags, fd, host_offset);
>
> I'm just starting to work on tracking the load/store. :-)

I don't think you have to care about that.  You want to print the
addresses your guest accesses (which are virtual since you're
running linux user mode, IIUC).

As I don't know anything about 0.9.1, all I can recommend is
again to look at what Vincent did;  in particular this:

http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~vince/projects/qemu-trace/qemu-mips-dinero.patch


Laurent