From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LhK9P-0001DV-S1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:50:55 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LhK9N-0001Ct-Ou for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:50:55 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57153 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LhK9N-0001Ck-D6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:50:53 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f171.google.com ([209.85.218.171]:60314) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LhK9M-0004ex-Tw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:50:53 -0400 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so1694384bwz.34 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:50:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B98098BBB@clara.maurer-it.com> References: <49B01FFD.7040900@codemonkey.ws> <49B3EE7F.40604@codemonkey.ws> <7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B98098BA4@clara.maurer-it.com> <200903101434.05464.paul@codesourcery.com> <7B7881568CF40E4388B615CD06F87B98098BBB@clara.maurer-it.com> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:50:50 +0100 Message-ID: <761ea48b0903110150x61cb7d5bg98dca31df47e1dda@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: QEMU 0.10.0 stable branch From: Laurent Desnogues Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Dietmar Maurer wrote: >> I think you're confusing stability with features and completeness. > > IMHO both stability is good and kvm/qemu has quite many features. I guess it depends on what targets you're talking about. Don't forget qemu supports CPU other than x86 and also has various user mode implementations. Laurent