From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MLL8r-00022e-8A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:59:45 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MLL8q-00022L-SK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:59:44 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44222 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MLL8q-00022I-Mt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:59:44 -0400
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:41903)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1MLL8q-00070m-A3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:59:44 -0400
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so979562fga.8
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5b31733c0906291050w355b2fe0n9ac6f62f3486e47c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5b31733c0906291050w355b2fe0n9ac6f62f3486e47c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:59:42 +0200
Message-ID: <761ea48b0906291059g13103602uc678cc318ac63015@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: TCG ARM optimizations
From: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Filip Navara <filip.navara@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Filip Navara<filip.navara@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Big thanks goes to Laurent Desnogues who actually had suggested where
> the bottlenecks are.

IIRC it's Paul who suggested that idea first on IRC months
ago, as I was complaining about the stupidity of the generated
code :-)


Laurent