From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MlIoq-0007Ou-Aj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:46:24 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MlIol-0007N8-AL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:46:23 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56905 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlIok-0007N0-UV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:46:19 -0400
Received: from mail-fx0-f211.google.com ([209.85.220.211]:56605)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1MlIok-00014T-Bi
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 04:46:18 -0400
Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so2981343fxm.34
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4AA6F0F2.2050409@mlbassoc.com>
References: <4AA6A14E.6010208@mlbassoc.com> <4AA6CE39.3000408@mlbassoc.com>
	<4AA6F0F2.2050409@mlbassoc.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 10:46:16 +0200
Message-ID: <761ea48b0909090146y447da167o4ad5258d12a6eb80@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] i386-linux-user on ARM host
From: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Gary Thomas<gary@mlbassoc.com> wrote:
[...]
>
> Sorry all, I've now figured out that it _does_ work, just not
> like I expected. =A0It seems that without a -L option to qemu,
> the executed code runs in something like a 'chroot' jail. =A0Is
> this the case? =A0If so, is there any way to let the emulated
> program live in the same file system [space] as other applications?
>
> The idea would be to be able to execute some program, e.g. something
> available as x86 only, on the ARM target and make the process as
> invisible as possible. =A0Can this be made to work?

How would you handle shared libraries?


Laurent