From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NKVcb-0002wE-0z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:31:17 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NKVcX-0002uP-3q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:31:16 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45616 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NKVcW-0002uJ-RK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:31:12 -0500
Received: from mail-pw0-f43.google.com ([209.85.160.43]:34653)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>) id 1NKVcW-0005jd-FY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:31:12 -0500
Received: by pwj11 with SMTP id 11so2328040pwj.2
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:31:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4B27076C.6020806@twiddle.net>
References: <4B267DBC.8050909@twiddle.net>
	<761ea48b0912141211keb5bbben584d7fe76f44d78c@mail.gmail.com>
	<4B26D8EF.10801@twiddle.net> <4B27076C.6020806@twiddle.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:31:10 +0100
Message-ID: <761ea48b0912150331l4cd942b1sef77d22c750b5a2b@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] target-alpha: An approach to fp insn qualifiers
From: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> wrote:
> On 12/14/2009 04:31 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>
>> On 12/14/2009 12:11 PM, Laurent Desnogues wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll take a closer look at your patch tomorrow.
>>
>> For the record, I believe this finishes what I had in mind for the
>> exception handling there in op_handler.c.
>
> Hmph. =A0One more patch for correctness. =A0With this 183.equake runs cor=
rectly.
> =A0I couldn't remember all the hoops to get runspec.pl to work, to do the
> whole testsuite, but I did run this one by hand.
>
> ./quake-amd64: Done. Terminating the simulation.
>
> real =A0 =A00m34.943s
> user =A0 =A00m34.913s
> sys =A0 =A0 0m0.024s
>
> ./quake-axp: Done. Terminating the simulation.
>
> real =A0 =A033m24.105s
> user =A0 =A033m23.674s
> sys =A0 =A0 0m0.116s
>
> with identical output.

Well equake works me with the last set of patches you sent (that is
without using this FPU patch you just sent).  Can you confirm?


Laurent