From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Sgp-0007Zx-Ap for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 03:14:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Sgl-00065A-1Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 03:13:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Sgk-00064a-RL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 03:13:54 -0500 References: <1479808693-30234-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <99e2e550-dad4-335f-e2d7-8a286863f57c@redhat.com> <8871cadb-3edf-5a3f-2da5-8981c12b79a0@redhat.com> <1479888396.16465.5.camel@redhat.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <772c480f-86c5-3162-256c-45ee9c0cc9ea@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:13:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1479888396.16465.5.camel@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] drm: update MAINTAINERS for qemu drivers (bochs, cirrus, qxl, virtio-gpu) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann , Eric Blake Cc: Paolo Bonzini , David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, open list On 23.11.2016 09:06, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > >>>>>>>> +L: qemu-devel@nongnu.org >>>>>> >>>>>> qemu-devel list already has very high traffic - not sure whether it >>>>>> makes much sense to route even more additional patches here. Maybe >>>>>> rather create a separate mailing list like qemu-graphics@nongnu.org ? > >> So you've just managed to convince me that including qemu-devel on every >> driver patch, when qemu.git will not be modified, may indeed be >> overkill; when compared to the option of just creating a new dedicated >> list for the subset of kernel patches related to qemu drivers. > > Well, that isn't my intention. I want the kernel patches for qemu > graphics being more visible for developers working on the host (device > emulation) side. A separate list just for those patches is quite the > contrary ... > > Maybe virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org would be a better choice > than qemu-devel ... Yes, I agree, that sounds like a better fit. You might even get the attention from other people there who are working on virtualization solutions other than QEMU. Thomas