From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Brad Smith <brad@comstyle.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] osdep: Deal with TIME_MAX and OpenBSD 64-bit time_t
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 18:41:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7733d617-0e56-acdc-ad6d-aafce0c7160d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171106112638.GF23361@redhat.com>
On 06/11/2017 12:26, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 10:51:16AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 6 November 2017 at 00:56, Brad Smith <brad@comstyle.com> wrote:
>>> Define TIME_MAX to LLONG_MAX for OpenBSD since OpenBSD uses 64-bit time_t.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Brad Smith <brad@comstyle.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/qemu/osdep.h b/include/qemu/osdep.h
>>> index 6855b94bbf..824714049b 100644
>>> --- a/include/qemu/osdep.h
>>> +++ b/include/qemu/osdep.h
>>> @@ -132,8 +132,12 @@ extern int daemon(int, int);
>>> #define ESHUTDOWN 4099
>>> #endif
>>> #ifndef TIME_MAX
>>> +#ifdef __OpenBSD__
>>> +#define TIME_MAX LLONG_MAX
>>> +#else
>>> #define TIME_MAX LONG_MAX
>>> #endif
>>> +#endif
>>
>> I'm not really a fan of adding new OS-specific #ifdefs --
>> what if one of the other BSDs uses or switches to 64-bit
>> time_t for 32-bit platforms? Is there some way we can detect
>> this generically at compile time (possibly in configure) ?
>
> You could use a pair of compile time asserts to figure it out.
>
> Would need one compile test to check 32 vs 64 bit:
>
> #include <time.h>
> char time_t_64bit[sizeof(time_t) == 8 ? 1 : -1];
>
> and a second to check signed vs unsigned:
>
> #include <time.h>
> char time_t_signed[(time_t) -1 < 0 ? 1 : -1];
>
>
> Save each of these programs to the file $TMPC, and then run 'compile_object'
> from configure. You then have a decision matrix for 4 different TIME_MAX
> values to write into config-host.h.
What about
#define type_max(t) \
((t) -1 > 0 \
? (t)~0 \
: (((t)1) << \
(sizeof(t) * 8 - 1)) - 1) \
#define TIME_MAX type_max(time_t)
? We don't need it to be a cpp constant, do we? Or if we did, we could
assume it to be signed, it's enough for the three users.
Thanks,
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-06 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-06 0:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] osdep: Deal with TIME_MAX and OpenBSD 64-bit time_t Brad Smith
2017-11-06 10:51 ` Peter Maydell
2017-11-06 11:26 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2017-11-06 17:41 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-11-23 15:31 ` Peter Maydell
2017-11-06 17:21 ` Kamil Rytarowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7733d617-0e56-acdc-ad6d-aafce0c7160d@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=brad@comstyle.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).