qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: "jsnow@redhat.com" <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	"qemu-block@nongnu.org" <qemu-block@nongnu.org>,
	Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/7] iotests: Update 241 to expose backing layer fragmentation
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:44:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77387fd3-3265-b48a-c2f6-a8a0613dfbb1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7f20c0df-5ff3-cd2f-391f-3dae1a4cb51c@virtuozzo.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1769 bytes --]

On 4/8/19 8:51 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 03.04.2019 6:05, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Previous commits have mentioned that our NBD server still sends
>> unaligned fragments when an active layer with large advertised minimum
>> block size is backed by another layer with a smaller block
>> size. Expand the test to actually cover this scenario, by using qcow2
>> encryption (which forces 512-byte alignment) with an unaligned raw
>> backing file.
>>
>> The test passes, but only because the client side works around the
>> server's non-compliance; if you repeat the test manually with tracing
>> turned on, you will see the server sending a status for 1000 bytes
>> data then 1048 bytes hole, which is not aligned. But reverting commit
>> 737d3f5244 shows that it is indeed the client working around the bug
>> in the server.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> 
> Oops, 241 fails for me:
> 
> -WARNING: Image format was not specified for '/home/eblake/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/t.raw' and probing guessed raw.
> +WARNING: Image format was not specified for '/work/src/qemu/eric/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/t.raw' and probing guessed raw.
> 
> We forget to filter output :(

The filter bug is pre-existing; separate patch for that is now posted.

> 
> Tested-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

I saw this email before -rc3, but thought I had only introduced the
problem in this patch which I omitted from my rc3 pull request. Oh well,
the actual break in iotests came earlier; if there's an -rc4 for other
reasons, we'll get the test fixed then.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	"jsnow@redhat.com" <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	"qemu-block@nongnu.org" <qemu-block@nongnu.org>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/7] iotests: Update 241 to expose backing layer fragmentation
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:44:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77387fd3-3265-b48a-c2f6-a8a0613dfbb1@redhat.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190410204458.WVF-2lhm8GqKfiTZTMKKK20QVUdBn1OsxQvCvZ25KF8@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7f20c0df-5ff3-cd2f-391f-3dae1a4cb51c@virtuozzo.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1769 bytes --]

On 4/8/19 8:51 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 03.04.2019 6:05, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Previous commits have mentioned that our NBD server still sends
>> unaligned fragments when an active layer with large advertised minimum
>> block size is backed by another layer with a smaller block
>> size. Expand the test to actually cover this scenario, by using qcow2
>> encryption (which forces 512-byte alignment) with an unaligned raw
>> backing file.
>>
>> The test passes, but only because the client side works around the
>> server's non-compliance; if you repeat the test manually with tracing
>> turned on, you will see the server sending a status for 1000 bytes
>> data then 1048 bytes hole, which is not aligned. But reverting commit
>> 737d3f5244 shows that it is indeed the client working around the bug
>> in the server.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> 
> Oops, 241 fails for me:
> 
> -WARNING: Image format was not specified for '/home/eblake/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/t.raw' and probing guessed raw.
> +WARNING: Image format was not specified for '/work/src/qemu/eric/tests/qemu-iotests/scratch/t.raw' and probing guessed raw.
> 
> We forget to filter output :(

The filter bug is pre-existing; separate patch for that is now posted.

> 
> Tested-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

I saw this email before -rc3, but thought I had only introduced the
problem in this patch which I omitted from my rc3 pull request. Oh well,
the actual break in iotests came earlier; if there's an -rc4 for other
reasons, we'll get the test fixed then.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-10 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-03  3:05 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0? 0/7] Final round of NBD alignment fixes Eric Blake
2019-04-03  3:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/7] nbd/server: Fix blockstatus trace Eric Blake
2019-04-05 14:13   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-05 14:13     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-03  3:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/7] nbd/server: Trace server noncompliance on unaligned requests Eric Blake
2019-04-05 14:39   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-05 14:39     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-05 20:04     ` Eric Blake
2019-04-05 20:04       ` Eric Blake
2019-04-08 12:14       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-08 12:14         ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-08 14:32         ` Eric Blake
2019-04-08 14:32           ` Eric Blake
2019-04-03  3:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] nbd/server: Don't fail NBD_OPT_INFO for byte-aligned sources Eric Blake
2019-04-05 15:34   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-05 15:34     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-03  3:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/7] iotests: Update 241 to expose backing layer fragmentation Eric Blake
2019-04-08 13:51   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-08 13:51     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-04-10 20:44     ` Eric Blake [this message]
2019-04-10 20:44       ` Eric Blake
2019-04-03  3:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/7] block: Fix BDRV_BLOCK_RAW status to honor alignment Eric Blake
2019-04-03 13:03   ` Kevin Wolf
2019-04-03 14:02     ` Eric Blake
2019-04-03  3:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] nbd/server: Avoid unaligned read/block_status from backing Eric Blake
2019-04-03  3:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.1 7/7] nbd/server: Avoid unaligned dirty-bitmap status Eric Blake
2019-04-04 14:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0? 8/7] nbd/client: Fix error message for server with unusable sizing Eric Blake
2019-04-04 15:22   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77387fd3-3265-b48a-c2f6-a8a0613dfbb1@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).