From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED734C43331 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 18:02:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C04FE2178F for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 18:02:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C04FE2178F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:46748 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSm7N-0003vK-EM for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:02:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSm5C-0002hs-N0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:00:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iSm5B-0005Qn-9x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:00:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48950) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iSm5B-0005OJ-1b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 13:00:33 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7E2A51146 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 18:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id l3so1491468wrx.21 for ; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 10:00:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XcSWEuLkg+pWnqHNgl6pW8noSA+3bcWaF87j0rdtyZ4=; b=E27BDU7TyGoZke7xbYJMwVNqFXJgZakwkITepg1xsqTNbpBgZXvo+NuZlpH0FKJYra kcMrevKupZJOgPGO2TYbQZ69RDVDW92pjwsvGGn5YRPxjC70fMDcm0eN7MdF6AS96A4X 9/KWA46s2r9j8yWEN80pgaJS1b5fVtNyPN/r3T4jhp2sAvuM2+QgCNCYZUdbqOv7i1Sg JOgfX+WiNqJJxQBBXEEN40HXMzH9vqwk+pn9Ab3nfytKpqhRDVkAndBQooKC0EhRoXOa qHSI6cQm7iAWJ71kAoSb9TowG5W28Nxz0ugbJCVmARr9qcCDOZ/INgEH+j19hh+q1OqY yB8A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWiFuRsfMrX6IVTDoJgo584O+2SxXCtmwfIIXuZa3b+SvSCN23b BbIPzSMyz8wc/8e+l9W6kNKmYu6mBLOdBBoxjsBHo/Clu7yFwB4ajA4KCQAhKeEzp4c56TDUb1A poC94xBO+oJsic90= X-Received: by 2002:adf:fa07:: with SMTP id m7mr3992112wrr.108.1573149629474; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 10:00:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwqnucKGpXwmxX0646MvkTlSQlpINJcVgYtCzzgP0JwfKPMkQtYpXmh8ag8SnnW0UZ+qYSC3A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fa07:: with SMTP id m7mr3992088wrr.108.1573149629273; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 10:00:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.101.1.81] ([176.12.107.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c15sm2485067wmb.45.2019.11.07.10.00.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Nov 2019 10:00:28 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Acceptance test: update kernel used on m68k/q800 test To: Laurent Vivier , Cleber Rosa , Eric Blake References: <20191028181643.5143-12-laurent@vivier.eu> <20191029232320.12419-1-crosa@redhat.com> <19097f6f-28a8-12ee-6761-da0f34735910@redhat.com> <1209928652.10986630.1573144690743.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: <77a6200c-7f53-4305-1aad-4574f0faa904@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 19:00:23 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Eduardo Habkost , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Willian Rampazzo Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 11/7/19 6:18 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le 07/11/2019 =C3=A0 17:38, Cleber Rosa a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Eric Blake" >>> To: "Cleber Rosa" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org >>> Cc: "Peter Maydell" , "Eduardo Habkost" , "Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9" >>> , "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" , "Laurent Vivier" , >>> "Willian Rampazzo" , "Philippe Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9= " >>> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 10:43:08 AM >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Acceptance test: update kernel used on m68k/= q800 test >>> >>> On 10/29/19 6:23 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote: >>>> The boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_m68k_q800 was very >>>> recently merged, but between its last review and now, the Kernel >>>> package used went missing. >>>> >>> >>> meta-question: Why was this series posted in-reply-to the pull reques= t, >>> rather than as a new top-level thread? I nearly missed it because I >>> don't expect to see unreviewed patches buried in threading like that. >>> My workflow would have been to post the series in isolation, then >>> manually reply to the pull request to mention the message-id of the >>> related series proposed as a followup. >>> >> >> Hi Eric, >> >> That was my attempt to signal that it was a fix to something which had= *just* >> being merged as part of that pull request (though now caused by it). >> >> I basically did not know how to act properly, so I thank you for the w= orkflow >> suggestion. I'll certainly follow it next time. >=20 > IMHO, you should send your series and then replies to the pull request > to tell you have sent your series that fixes the patch in the pull > request, or vice-versa. >=20 > But your series has been queued by Alex, so there is no problem... I prepared a different fix around the same time, but closed my laptop=20 before the patch was sent and noticed the next day: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg08120.html Laurent, are you OK with the new kernel being tested?