From: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>
To: Chalapathi V <chalapathi.v@linux.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, fbarrat@linux.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
calebs@us.ibm.com, chalapathi.v@ibm.com,
saif.abrar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dantan@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] hw/ppc: SPI controller model - registers implementation
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:06:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <77d1ec7c-9ea4-4bd3-a734-aab666a9a123@kaod.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <95272abb-fb3c-4e80-8f41-a7974ae564be@linux.ibm.com>
On 4/16/24 19:02, Chalapathi V wrote:
>
> On 15-04-2024 20:44, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> Hello Chalapathi
>>
>> The subject could be rephrased to : "ppc/pnv: Add SPI controller model".
>>
>> On 4/9/24 19:56, Chalapathi V wrote:
>>> SPI controller device model supports a connection to a single SPI responder.
>>> This provide access to SPI seeproms, TPM, flash device and an ADC controller.
>>>
>>> All SPI function control is mapped into the SPI register space to enable full
>>> control by firmware. In this commit SPI configuration component is modelled
>>> which contains all SPI configuration and status registers as well as the hold
>>> registers for data to be sent or having been received.
>>>
>>> An existing QEMU SSI framework is used and SSI_BUS is created.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chalapathi V <chalapathi.v@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller.h | 55 +++++
>>> include/hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller_regs.h | 114 ++++++++++
>>
>> These two files should be under hw/ssi/ and include/hw/ssi/. Please
>> remove '_controller'.
> Sure. Thank You.
>>
>>> include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h | 3 +
>>> hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller.c | 278 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> hw/ppc/Kconfig | 1 +
>>> hw/ppc/meson.build | 1 +
>>> 6 files changed, 452 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 include/hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller.h
>>> create mode 100644 include/hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller_regs.h
>>> create mode 100644 hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000000..5ec50fb14c
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * QEMU PowerPC SPI Controller model
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2024, IBM Corporation.
>>> + *
>>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>>> + *
>>> + * This model Supports a connection to a single SPI responder.
>>> + * Introduced for P10 to provide access to SPI seeproms, TPM, flash device
>>> + * and an ADC controller.
>>> + */
>>> +#include "hw/ssi/ssi.h"
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef PPC_PNV_SPI_CONTROLLER_H
>>> +#define PPC_PNV_SPI_CONTROLLER_H
>>> +
>>> +#define TYPE_PNV_SPI_CONTROLLER "pnv-spi-controller"
>>> +#define PNV_SPICONTROLLER(obj) \
>>> + OBJECT_CHECK(PnvSpiController, (obj), TYPE_PNV_SPI_CONTROLLER)
>>
>> You could use OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE ? Anyhow, I would prefer
>> naming the macro PNV_SPI_CONTROLLER.
>>
>>> +#define SPI_CONTROLLER_REG_SIZE 8
>>> +
>>> +typedef struct SSIBus SSIBus;
>>
>> why ?
> I might have got compile time errors. I will recheck and update. Thank You.
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> +#define TYPE_PNV_SPI_BUS "pnv-spi-bus"
>>> +OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(PnvSPIBus, PNV_SPI_BUS)
>>> +
>>> +typedef struct PnvSPIBus {
>>
>> I don't think this extra PnvSPIBus model is useful.
>>
>>> + SysBusDevice parent_obj;
>>> +
>>> + SSIBus *ssi_bus;
>>> + qemu_irq *cs_line;
>>
>> These two attributes could live under PnvSpiController.
> This is added to have a SysBusDevice parent so that I can use the busname in command line for TPM. I will add these in PnvSpiController with SysBusDevice parent and test.
You could still compute the bus name from pnv_spi_controller_realize()
and move all PnvSPIBus attributes under PnvSpiController. The PnvSPIBus
is not required.
>>
>>> + uint32_t id;
>>
>> and this one would become useless.
>>
>>> +} PnvSPIBus;
>>>
>>> +typedef struct PnvSpiController {
>>> + DeviceState parent;
>>> +
>>> + PnvSPIBus bus;
>>> + MemoryRegion xscom_spic_regs;
>>> + /* SPI controller object number */
>>> + uint32_t spic_num;
>>> +
>>> + /* SPI Controller registers */
>>> + uint64_t error_reg;
>>> + uint64_t counter_config_reg;
>>> + uint64_t config_reg1;
>>> + uint64_t clock_config_reset_control;
>>> + uint64_t memory_mapping_reg;
>>> + uint64_t transmit_data_reg;
>>> + uint64_t receive_data_reg;
>>> + uint8_t sequencer_operation_reg[SPI_CONTROLLER_REG_SIZE];
>>> + uint64_t status_reg;
>>
>> You could use an array of uint64_t also.
> Sure. I will try and check.
That's not a must have. Both approach work but since the memops use
the MMIO offest to address the register, it is sometime simpler to
use an array of uint64_t.
>>
>>
>>> +} PnvSpiController;
>>> +#endif /* PPC_PNV_SPI_CONTROLLER_H */
>>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller_regs.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller_regs.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000000..6f613aca5e
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller_regs.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * QEMU PowerPC SPI Controller model
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2023, IBM Corporation.
>>> + *
>>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef SPI_CONTROLLER_REGS_H
>>> +#define SPI_CONTROLLER_REGS_H
>>> +
>>> +/* Error Register */
>>> +#define ERROR_REG 0x00
>>> +
>>> +/* counter_config_reg */
>>> +#define COUNTER_CONFIG_REG 0x01
>>> +#define COUNTER_CONFIG_REG_SHIFT_COUNT_N1 PPC_BITMASK(0, 7)
>>> +#define COUNTER_CONFIG_REG_SHIFT_COUNT_N2 PPC_BITMASK(8, 15)
>>> +#define COUNTER_CONFIG_REG_COUNT_COMPARE1 PPC_BITMASK(24, 31)
>>> +#define COUNTER_CONFIG_REG_COUNT_COMPARE2 PPC_BITMASK(32, 39)
>>> +#define COUNTER_CONFIG_REG_N1_COUNT_CONTROL PPC_BITMASK(48, 51)
>>> +#define COUNTER_CONFIG_REG_N2_COUNT_CONTROL PPC_BITMASK(52, 55)
>>> +
>>> +/* config_reg */
>>> +#define CONFIG_REG1 0x02
>>> +
>>> +/* clock_config_reset_control_ecc_enable_reg */
>>> +#define CLOCK_CONFIG_REG 0x03
>>> +#define CLOCK_CONFIG_RESET_CONTROL_HARD_RESET 0x0084000000000000;
>>> +#define CLOCK_CONFIG_REG_RESET_CONTROL PPC_BITMASK(24, 27)
>>> +#define CLOCK_CONFIG_REG_ECC_CONTROL PPC_BITMASK(28, 30)
>>> +
>>> +/* memory_mapping_reg */
>>> +#define MEMORY_MAPPING_REG 0x04
>>> +#define MEMORY_MAPPING_REG_MMSPISM_BASE_ADDR PPC_BITMASK(0, 15)
>>> +#define MEMORY_MAPPING_REG_MMSPISM_ADDR_MASK PPC_BITMASK(16, 31)
>>> +#define MEMORY_MAPPING_REG_RDR_MATCH_VAL PPC_BITMASK(32, 47)
>>> +#define MEMORY_MAPPING_REG_RDR_MATCH_MASK PPC_BITMASK(48, 63)
>>> +
>>> +/* transmit_data_reg */
>>> +#define TRANSMIT_DATA_REG 0x05
>>> +
>>> +/* receive_data_reg */
>>> +#define RECEIVE_DATA_REG 0x06
>>> +
>>> +/* sequencer_operation_reg */
>>> +#define SEQUENCER_OPERATION_REG 0x07
>>> +
>>> +/* status_reg */
>>> +#define STATUS_REG 0x08
>>> +#define STATUS_REG_RDR_FULL PPC_BIT(0)
>>> +#define STATUS_REG_RDR_OVERRUN PPC_BIT(1)
>>> +#define STATUS_REG_RDR_UNDERRUN PPC_BIT(2)
>>> +#define STATUS_REG_TDR_FULL PPC_BIT(4)
>>> +#define STATUS_REG_TDR_OVERRUN PPC_BIT(5)
>>> +#define STATUS_REG_TDR_UNDERRUN PPC_BIT(6)
>>> +#define STATUS_REG_SEQUENCER_FSM PPC_BITMASK(8, 15)
>>> +#define STATUS_REG_SHIFTER_FSM PPC_BITMASK(16, 27)
>>> +#define STATUS_REG_SEQUENCER_INDEX PPC_BITMASK(28, 31)
>>> +#define STATUS_REG_GENERAL_SPI_STATUS PPC_BITMASK(32, 63)
>>> +#define STATUS_REG_RDR PPC_BITMASK(1, 3)
>>> +#define STATUS_REG_TDR PPC_BITMASK(5, 7)
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Shifter states
>>> + *
>>> + * These are the same values defined for the Shifter FSM field of the
>>> + * status register. It's a 12 bit field so we will represent it as three
>>> + * nibbles in the constants.
>>> + *
>>> + * These are shifter_fsm values
>>> + *
>>> + * Status reg bits 16-27 -> field bits 0-11
>>> + * bits 0,1,2,5 unused/reserved
>>> + * bit 4 crc shift in (unused)
>>> + * bit 8 crc shift out (unused)
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#define FSM_DONE 0x100 /* bit 3 */
>>> +#define FSM_SHIFT_N2 0x020 /* bit 6 */
>>> +#define FSM_WAIT 0x010 /* bit 7 */
>>> +#define FSM_SHIFT_N1 0x004 /* bit 9 */
>>> +#define FSM_START 0x002 /* bit 10 */
>>> +#define FSM_IDLE 0x001 /* bit 11 */
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Sequencer states
>>> + *
>>> + * These are sequencer_fsm values
>>> + *
>>> + * Status reg bits 8-15 -> field bits 0-7
>>> + * bits 0-3 unused/reserved
>>> + *
>>> + */
>>> +#define SEQ_STATE_INDEX_INCREMENT 0x08 /* bit 4 */
>>> +#define SEQ_STATE_EXECUTE 0x04 /* bit 5 */
>>> +#define SEQ_STATE_DECODE 0x02 /* bit 6 */
>>> +#define SEQ_STATE_IDLE 0x01 /* bit 7 */
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * These are the supported sequencer operations.
>>> + * Only the upper nibble is significant because for many operations
>>> + * the lower nibble is a variable specific to the operation.
>>> + */
>>> +#define SEQ_OP_STOP 0x00
>>> +#define SEQ_OP_SELECT_SLAVE 0x10
>>> +#define SEQ_OP_SHIFT_N1 0x30
>>> +#define SEQ_OP_SHIFT_N2 0x40
>>> +#define SEQ_OP_BRANCH_IFNEQ_RDR 0x60
>>> +#define SEQ_OP_TRANSFER_TDR 0xC0
>>> +#define SEQ_OP_BRANCH_IFNEQ_INC_1 0xE0
>>> +#define SEQ_OP_BRANCH_IFNEQ_INC_2 0xF0
>>> +
>>> +#endif
>>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h
>>> index 6209e18492..a77b97f9b1 100644
>>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h
>>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h
>>> @@ -194,6 +194,9 @@ struct PnvXScomInterfaceClass {
>>> #define PNV10_XSCOM_PEC_PCI_BASE 0x8010800 /* index goes upwards ... */
>>> #define PNV10_XSCOM_PEC_PCI_SIZE 0x200
>>> +#define PNV10_XSCOM_PIB_SPIC_BASE 0xc0000
>>> +#define PNV10_XSCOM_PIB_SPIC_SIZE 0x20
>>> +
>>> void pnv_xscom_init(PnvChip *chip, uint64_t size, hwaddr addr);
>>> int pnv_dt_xscom(PnvChip *chip, void *fdt, int root_offset,
>>> uint64_t xscom_base, uint64_t xscom_size,
>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000000..e2478a47f2
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,278 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * QEMU PowerPC SPI Controller model
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2024, IBM Corporation.
>>> + *
>>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include "qemu/osdep.h"
>>> +#include "qemu/log.h"
>>> +#include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
>>> +#include "hw/ppc/pnv_xscom.h"
>>> +#include "hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller.h"
>>> +#include "hw/ppc/pnv_spi_controller_regs.h"
>>> +#include "hw/ssi/ssi.h"
>>> +#include "hw/ppc/fdt.h"
>>> +#include <libfdt.h>
>>> +#include <math.h>
>>> +#include "hw/irq.h"
>>> +
>>> +#define SPI_DEBUG(x)
>>> +
>>> +static uint64_t pnv_spi_controller_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>>> + unsigned size)
>>> +{
>>> + PnvSpiController *sc = PNV_SPICONTROLLER(opaque);
>>
>> The name 'sc' makes you think of a class. 's' is common in QEMU models.
> Sure. Will modify.
>>
>>> + uint32_t reg = addr >> 3;
>>> + uint64_t val = ~0ull;
>>> +
>>> + switch (reg) {
>>> + case ERROR_REG:
>>> + val = sc->error_reg;
>>> + break;
>>> + case COUNTER_CONFIG_REG:
>>> + val = sc->counter_config_reg;
>>> + break;
>>> + case CONFIG_REG1:
>>> + val = sc->config_reg1;
>>> + break;
>>> + case CLOCK_CONFIG_REG:
>>> + val = sc->clock_config_reset_control;
>>> + break;
>>> + case MEMORY_MAPPING_REG:
>>> + val = sc->memory_mapping_reg;
>>> + break;
>>> + case TRANSMIT_DATA_REG:
>>> + val = sc->transmit_data_reg;
>>> + break;
>>> + case RECEIVE_DATA_REG:
>>> + val = sc->receive_data_reg;
>>> + SPI_DEBUG(qemu_log("RDR being read, data extracted = 0x%16.16lx\n",
>>> + val));
>>
>> please use trace events instead of the SPI_DEBUG macro.
> Sure. Will replace with trace events wherever necessary.
then you can use '-trace pnv_spi*' from the command line to activate extra
logging. Very useful.
Thanks,
C.
>>
>>> + sc->status_reg = SETFIELD(STATUS_REG_RDR_FULL, sc->status_reg, 0);
>>> + SPI_DEBUG(qemu_log("RDR being read, RDR_full set to 0\n"));
>>> + break;
>>> + case SEQUENCER_OPERATION_REG:
>>> + val = 0;
>>> + for (int i = 0; i < SPI_CONTROLLER_REG_SIZE; i++) {
>>> + val = (val << 8) | sc->sequencer_operation_reg[i];
>>> + }
>>> + break;
>>> + case STATUS_REG:
>>> + val = sc->status_reg;
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "spi_controller_regs: Invalid xscom "
>>> + "read at 0x%08x\n", reg);
>>> + }
>>> + return val;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void pnv_spi_controller_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>>> + uint64_t val, unsigned size)
>>> +{
>>> + PnvSpiController *sc = PNV_SPICONTROLLER(opaque);
>>> + uint32_t reg = addr >> 3;
>>> +
>>> + switch (reg) {
>>> + case ERROR_REG:
>>> + sc->error_reg = val;
>>> + break;
>>> + case COUNTER_CONFIG_REG:
>>> + sc->counter_config_reg = val;
>>> + break;
>>> + case CONFIG_REG1:
>>> + sc->config_reg1 = val;
>>> + break;
>>> + case CLOCK_CONFIG_REG:
>>> + /*
>>> + * To reset the SPI controller write the sequence 0x5 0xA to
>>> + * reset_control field
>>> + */
>>> + if (GETFIELD(CLOCK_CONFIG_REG_RESET_CONTROL,
>>> + sc->clock_config_reset_control) == 0x5) {
>>> + if (GETFIELD(CLOCK_CONFIG_REG_RESET_CONTROL, val) == 0xA) {
>>> + SPI_DEBUG(qemu_log("SPI controller reset sequence completed, "
>>> + "resetting..."));
>>> + sc->clock_config_reset_control =
>>> + CLOCK_CONFIG_RESET_CONTROL_HARD_RESET;
>>> + } else {
>>> + sc->clock_config_reset_control = val;
>>> + }
>>> + } else {
>>> + sc->clock_config_reset_control = val;
>>> + }
>>> + break;
>>> + case MEMORY_MAPPING_REG:
>>> + sc->memory_mapping_reg = val;
>>> + break;
>>> + case TRANSMIT_DATA_REG:
>>> + /*
>>> + * Writing to the transmit data register causes the transmit data
>>> + * register full status bit in the status register to be set. Writing
>>> + * when the transmit data register full status bit is already set
>>> + * causes a "Resource Not Available" condition. This is not possible
>>> + * in the model since writes to this register are not asynchronous to
>>> + * the operation sequence like it would be in hardware.
>>> + */
>>> + sc->transmit_data_reg = val;
>>> + SPI_DEBUG(qemu_log("TDR being written, data written = 0x%16.16lx\n",
>>> + val));
>>> + sc->status_reg = SETFIELD(STATUS_REG_TDR_FULL, sc->status_reg, 1);
>>> + SPI_DEBUG(qemu_log("TDR being written, TDR_full set to 1\n"));
>>> + sc->status_reg = SETFIELD(STATUS_REG_TDR_UNDERRUN, sc->status_reg, 0);
>>> + SPI_DEBUG(qemu_log("TDR being written, TDR_underrun set to 0\n"));
>>> + SPI_DEBUG(qemu_log("TDR being written, starting sequencer\n"));
>>> + break;
>>> + case RECEIVE_DATA_REG:
>>> + sc->receive_data_reg = val;
>>> + break;
>>> + case SEQUENCER_OPERATION_REG:
>>> + for (int i = 0; i < SPI_CONTROLLER_REG_SIZE; i++) {
>>> + sc->sequencer_operation_reg[i] = (val >> (56 - i * 8)) & 0xFF;
>>> + }
>>> + break;
>>> + case STATUS_REG:
>>> + /* other fields are ignore_write */
>>> + sc->status_reg = SETFIELD(STATUS_REG_RDR_OVERRUN, sc->status_reg,
>>> + GETFIELD(STATUS_REG_RDR, val));
>>> + sc->status_reg = SETFIELD(STATUS_REG_TDR_OVERRUN, sc->status_reg,
>>> + GETFIELD(STATUS_REG_TDR, val));
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "spi_controller_regs: Invalid xscom "
>>> + "write at 0x%08x\n", reg);
>>> + }
>>> + return;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const MemoryRegionOps pnv_spi_controller_xscom_ops = {
>>> + .read = pnv_spi_controller_read,
>>> + .write = pnv_spi_controller_write,
>>> + .valid.min_access_size = 8,
>>> + .valid.max_access_size = 8,
>>> + .impl.min_access_size = 8,
>>> + .impl.max_access_size = 8,
>>> + .endianness = DEVICE_BIG_ENDIAN,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static void pnv_spi_bus_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>>> +{
>>> + PnvSPIBus *s = PNV_SPI_BUS(dev);
>>> + SysBusDevice *sbd = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev);
>>> + g_autofree char *name = g_strdup_printf(TYPE_PNV_SPI_BUS ".%d", s->id);
>>> +
>>> + s->ssi_bus = ssi_create_bus(dev, name);
>>> + s->cs_line = g_new0(qemu_irq, 1);
>>> + sysbus_init_irq(sbd, &s->cs_line[0]);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static Property pnv_spi_bus_properties[] = {
>>> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("bus-id", PnvSPIBus, id, 0),
>>> + DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static void pnv_spi_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>>> +{
>>> + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>>> +
>>> + dc->desc = "Pnv SPI Bus";
>>> + dc->realize = pnv_spi_bus_realize;
>>> + device_class_set_props(dc, pnv_spi_bus_properties);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const TypeInfo pnv_spi_bus_info = {
>>> + .name = TYPE_PNV_SPI_BUS,
>>> + .parent = TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE,
>>> + .instance_size = sizeof(PnvSPIBus),
>>> + .class_init = pnv_spi_bus_class_init,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static Property pnv_spi_controller_properties[] = {
>>> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("spic_num", PnvSpiController, spic_num, 0),
>>> + DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static void pnv_spi_controller_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>>> +{
>>> + PnvSpiController *sc = PNV_SPICONTROLLER(dev);
>>> +
>>> + Object *bus = OBJECT(&sc->bus);
>>> + if (!object_property_set_int(bus, "bus-id", sc->spic_num, errp)) {
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (!sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(bus), errp)) {
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* spi controller scoms */
>>> + pnv_xscom_region_init(&sc->xscom_spic_regs, OBJECT(sc),
>>> + &pnv_spi_controller_xscom_ops, sc,
>>> + "xscom-spi-controller-regs",
>>> + PNV10_XSCOM_PIB_SPIC_SIZE);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int pnv_spi_controller_dt_xscom(PnvXScomInterface *dev, void *fdt,
>>> + int offset)
>>> +{
>>> + PnvSpiController *sc = PNV_SPICONTROLLER(dev);
>>> + g_autofree char *name;
>>> + int sc_offset;
>>> + const char compat[] = "ibm,power10-spi_controller";
>>> + uint32_t spic_pcba = PNV10_XSCOM_PIB_SPIC_BASE +
>>> + sc->spic_num * PNV10_XSCOM_PIB_SPIC_SIZE;
>>> + uint32_t reg[] = {
>>> + cpu_to_be32(spic_pcba),
>>> + cpu_to_be32(PNV10_XSCOM_PIB_SPIC_SIZE)
>>> + };
>>> + name = g_strdup_printf("spi_controller@%x", spic_pcba);
>>> + sc_offset = fdt_add_subnode(fdt, offset, name);
>>> + _FDT(sc_offset);
>>> +
>>> + _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, sc_offset, "reg", reg, sizeof(reg)));
>>> + _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, sc_offset, "compatible", compat, sizeof(compat)));
>>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, sc_offset, "spic_num#", sc->spic_num)));
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void pnv_spi_instance_init(Object *obj)
>>> +{
>>> + PnvSpiController *sc = PNV_SPICONTROLLER(obj);
>>> +
>>> + /* Initialise the bus object */
>>> + object_initialize_child(obj, "bus", &sc->bus, TYPE_PNV_SPI_BUS);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void pnv_spi_controller_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>>> +{
>>> + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>>> + PnvXScomInterfaceClass *xscomc = PNV_XSCOM_INTERFACE_CLASS(klass);
>>> +
>>> + xscomc->dt_xscom = pnv_spi_controller_dt_xscom;
>>> +
>>> + dc->desc = "PowerNV SPI Controller";
>>> + dc->realize = pnv_spi_controller_realize;
>>> + device_class_set_props(dc, pnv_spi_controller_properties);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const TypeInfo pnv_spi_controller_info = {
>>> + .name = TYPE_PNV_SPI_CONTROLLER,
>>> + .parent = TYPE_DEVICE,
>>> + .instance_init = pnv_spi_instance_init,
>>> + .instance_size = sizeof(PnvSpiController),
>>> + .class_init = pnv_spi_controller_class_init,
>>> + .interfaces = (InterfaceInfo[]) {
>>> + { TYPE_PNV_XSCOM_INTERFACE },
>>> + { }
>>> + }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static void pnv_spi_controller_register_types(void)
>>> +{
>>> + type_register_static(&pnv_spi_bus_info);
>>> + type_register_static(&pnv_spi_controller_info);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +type_init(pnv_spi_controller_register_types);
>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/Kconfig b/hw/ppc/Kconfig
>>> index 37ccf9cdca..ea1178bd73 100644
>>> --- a/hw/ppc/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/Kconfig
>>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ config POWERNV
>>> select PCI_POWERNV
>>> select PCA9552
>>> select PCA9554
>>> + select SSI
>>> config PPC405
>>> bool
>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/meson.build b/hw/ppc/meson.build
>>> index d096636ee7..68fadbae7b 100644
>>> --- a/hw/ppc/meson.build
>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/meson.build
>>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ ppc_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_POWERNV', if_true: files(
>>> 'pnv_pnor.c',
>>> 'pnv_nest_pervasive.c',
>>> 'pnv_n1_chiplet.c',
>>> + 'pnv_spi_controller.c',
>>> ))
>>> # PowerPC 4xx boards
>>> ppc_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_PPC405', if_true: files(
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-22 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-09 17:56 [PATCH v2 0/6] hw/ppc: SPI model Chalapathi V
2024-04-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] hw/ppc: remove SPI responder model Chalapathi V
2024-04-15 14:46 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] hw/ppc: SPI controller model - registers implementation Chalapathi V
2024-04-15 15:14 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-16 17:02 ` Chalapathi V
2024-04-22 14:06 ` Cédric Le Goater [this message]
2024-04-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] hw/ppc: SPI controller model - sequencer and shifter Chalapathi V
2024-04-16 9:39 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-16 17:08 ` Chalapathi V
2024-04-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] hw/misc: Microchip's 25CSM04 SEEPROM model Chalapathi V
2024-04-22 14:44 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-09 17:56 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] hw/ppc: SPI controller wiring to P10 chip and create seeprom device Chalapathi V
2024-04-22 15:03 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-24 17:12 ` Chalapathi V
2024-04-09 17:57 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] tests/qtest: Add pnv-spi-seeprom qtest Chalapathi V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=77d1ec7c-9ea4-4bd3-a734-aab666a9a123@kaod.org \
--to=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=calebs@us.ibm.com \
--cc=chalapathi.v@ibm.com \
--cc=chalapathi.v@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dantan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=fbarrat@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=saif.abrar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).