From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iotests: Check for enabled drivers before testing them
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 21:19:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <77f00bba-ce4b-ec6e-e48c-89ea797f3cd3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b35ee5a6-e3b1-d134-0a28-bfd45f5c8de4@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1666 bytes --]
On 8/20/19 8:48 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 20.08.19 18:01, Thomas Huth wrote:
[...]
>> Well, we disable blkverify in our downstream RHEL version of QEMU - so
>> it would be great if the iotests could at least adapt to that missing
>> driver.
>
> I would like to say that RHEL is not a gold standard
Well, let's put it this way: The less changes we have to carry along
downstream (and thus review each time we rebase the downstream tree),
the more time we have to work on upstream.
> It feels a bit weird to me to say “blkverify is not essential, because
> RHEL disables it, but null-co is” – even though there is no reason why
> anyone would need null-co except for testing either.
Ok, fine for me, too, if we also declare "null-co" as optional for the
iotests - let's make sure that the tests in the "auto" group also work
without them.
>>> Of course, that no longer works as an argument now that we
>>> unconditionally run some iotests in make check.
>>>
>>> But still, the question is how strict you want to be. If blkdebug
>>> cannot be assumed to be present, what about null-co? What about raw?
>>
>> I tried to disable everything beside qcow2 - but that causes so many
>> things to fail that it hardly makes sense to try to get that working.
>
> Hm, really? I just whitelisted qcow2 and file and running the auto
> group worked rather well (except for the failing tests you address here,
> and the two others I mentioned).
IIRC I tried to run all qcow2 tests when I disabled null-co and saw lots
of failures ... but anyway, let's just focus on the "auto" tests right
now, that should be doable.
Thomas
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-20 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-19 7:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iotests: Check for enabled drivers before testing them Thomas Huth
2019-08-19 8:22 ` no-reply
2019-08-20 15:01 ` Max Reitz
2019-08-20 16:01 ` Thomas Huth
2019-08-20 18:48 ` Max Reitz
2019-08-20 19:19 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2019-08-20 19:23 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=77f00bba-ce4b-ec6e-e48c-89ea797f3cd3@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).