From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C35C43461 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:29:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42312206F4 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:29:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="R++tfRvU" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 42312206F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:52308 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHivm-0007Vc-As for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 03:29:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51842) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHiuM-0005kL-06 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 03:28:14 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:45472 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kHiuJ-0003Gq-49 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 03:28:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600068490; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FgMz1ZkE4YUuyjDKhAfFLq49UZlxj5WAFh2mKeksEUQ=; b=R++tfRvUuC+wEBRnia94QUBDeU5kwGleI6/egIpBmuXPqTMMs2gVuznPxLISgDMUm89VoL 3BTmkW6A7eIm+x2Hc7ZS4JuZwXtjwvMXQTGOq5YpXhIzxKoM3OO+uKE4L+G5n1i4UrqNWI EgJpgy1ypBIlNGVea5LvYFoY10YE6L4= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-287-9EerQGXwN9WQuFYbkYy9DA-1; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 03:28:06 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 9EerQGXwN9WQuFYbkYy9DA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C89C11008566; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth.remote.csb (ovpn-112-134.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.134]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07A581F41; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:27:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 16/27] cirrus: Building freebsd in a single short To: Yonggang Luo , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <20200912224431.1428-1-luoyonggang@gmail.com> <20200912224431.1428-17-luoyonggang@gmail.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <78c65c60-9598-97a2-0dc7-116c3c0f94a9@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 09:27:29 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200912224431.1428-17-luoyonggang@gmail.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=thuth@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.002 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=207.211.31.81; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/14 00:11:19 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -37 X-Spam_score: -3.8 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.695, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Ed Maste , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Stefan Weil , Xie Changlong , Peter Lieven , Michael Roth , Markus Armbruster , Richard Henderson , Paolo Bonzini , Gerd Hoffmann , Wen Congyang , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P_=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= , Max Reitz , Li-Wen Hsu Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 13/09/2020 00.44, Yonggang Luo wrote: > This reverts commit 45f7b7b9f38f5c4d1529a37c93dedfc26a231bba > ("cirrus.yml: Split FreeBSD job into two parts"). > > freebsd 1 hour limit not hit anymore > > I think we going to a wrong direction, I think there is some tests a stall the test runner, > please look at > https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5110577531977728 > When its running properly, the consumed time are little, but when tests running too long, > look at the cpu usage, the cpu usage are nearly zero. doesn't consuming time. > > And look at > https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6119341601062912 > > If the tests running properly, the time consuming are little > We should not hide the error by split them > > Signed-off-by: Yonggang Luo > Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé > Reviewed-by: Ed Maste > --- > .cirrus.yml | 35 ++++++++--------------------------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) I tried this a couple of times now, and currently the problem seems to be gone, indeed. I'd still prefer to understand first why we have seen the slowdown a couple of weeks ago, but if people agree that we should revert the patch now, that's ok for me now, too. Tested-by: Thomas Huth