From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
To: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"mtosatti@redhat.com" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target/i386/kvm: call kvm_put_vcpu_events() before kvm_put_nested_state()
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 07:52:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78ddc3c3-6cfa-b48c-5d73-903adec6ac4a@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D761458A-9296-492B-85B9-F196C7D11CDA@nutanix.com>
Cc'ing Vitaly.
On 26/10/23 07:49, Eiichi Tsukata wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is additional details on the issue.
>
> We've found this issue when testing Windows Virtual Secure Mode (VSM) VMs.
> We sometimes saw live migration failures of VSM-enabled VMs. It turned
> out that the issue happens during live migration when VMs change boot related
> EFI variables (ex: BootOrder, Boot0001).
> After some debugging, I've found the race I mentioned in the commit message.
>
> Symptom
> =======
>
> When it happnes with the latest Qemu which has commit https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/7191f24c7fcfbc1216d09
> Qemu shows the following error message on destination.
>
> qemu-system-x86_64: Failed to put registers after init: Invalid argument
>
> If it happens with older Qemu which doesn't have the commit, then we see CPU dump something like this:
>
> KVM internal error. Suberror: 3
> extra data[0]: 0x0000000080000b0e
> extra data[1]: 0x0000000000000031
> extra data[2]: 0x0000000000000683
> extra data[3]: 0x000000007f809000
> extra data[4]: 0x0000000000000026
> RAX=0000000000000000 RBX=0000000000000000 RCX=0000000000000000 RDX=0000000000000f61
> RSI=0000000000000000 RDI=0000000000000000 RBP=0000000000000000 RSP=0000000000000000
> R8 =0000000000000000 R9 =0000000000000000 R10=0000000000000000 R11=0000000000000000
> R12=0000000000000000 R13=0000000000000000 R14=0000000000000000 R15=0000000000000000
> RIP=000000000000fff0 RFL=00010002 [-------] CPL=0 II=0 A20=1 SMM=0 HLT=0
> ES =0020 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
> CS =0038 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00a09b00 DPL=0 CS64 [-RA]
> SS =0020 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
> DS =0020 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
> FS =0020 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
> GS =0020 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
> LDT=0000 0000000000000000 ffffffff 00c00000
> TR =0040 000000007f7df050 00068fff 00808b00 DPL=0 TSS64-busy
> GDT= 000000007f7df000 0000004f
> IDT= 000000007f836000 000001ff
> CR0=80010033 CR2=000000000000fff0 CR3=000000007f809000 CR4=00000668
> DR0=0000000000000000 DR1=0000000000000000 DR2=0000000000000000 DR3=0000000000000000 DR6=00000000ffff0ff0 DR7=0000000000000400
> EFER=0000000000000d00
> Code=?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? <??> ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
>
> In the above dump, CR3 is pointing to SMRAM region though SMM=0.
>
> Repro
> =====
>
> Repro step is pretty simple.
>
> * Run SMM enabled Linux guest with secure boot enabled OVMF.
> * Run the following script in the guest.
>
> /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm &
> while true
> do
> efibootmgr -n 1
> done
>
> * Do live migration
>
> On my environment, live migration fails in 20%.
>
> VMX specific
> ============
>
> This issue is VMX sepcific and SVM is not affected as the validation
> in svm_set_nested_state() is a bit different from VMX one.
>
> VMX:
>
> static int vmx_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_nested_state __user *user_kvm_nested_state,
> struct kvm_nested_state *kvm_state)
> {
> .. /* * SMM temporarily disables VMX, so we cannot be in guest mode,
> * nor can VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME be pending. Outside SMM, SMM flags
> * must be zero.
> */ if (is_smm(vcpu) ?
> (kvm_state->flags &
> (KVM_STATE_NESTED_GUEST_MODE | KVM_STATE_NESTED_RUN_PENDING))
> : kvm_state->hdr.vmx.smm.flags)
> return -EINVAL;
> ..
>
> SVM:
>
> static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_nested_state __user *user_kvm_nested_state,
> struct kvm_nested_state *kvm_state)
> {
> .. /* SMM temporarily disables SVM, so we cannot be in guest mode. */ if (is_smm(vcpu) && (kvm_state->flags & KVM_STATE_NESTED_GUEST_MODE))
> return -EINVAL;
> ..
>
> Thanks,
>
> Eiichi
>
>> On Oct 26, 2023, at 14:42, Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com> wrote:
>>
>> kvm_put_vcpu_events() needs to be called before kvm_put_nested_state()
>> because vCPU's hflag is referred in KVM vmx_get_nested_state()
>> validation. Otherwise kvm_put_nested_state() can fail with -EINVAL when
>> a vCPU is in VMX operation and enters SMM mode. This leads to live
>> migration failure.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eiichi Tsukata <eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com>
>> ---
>> target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 13 +++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
>> index e7c054cc16..cd635c9142 100644
>> --- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
>> +++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
>> @@ -4741,6 +4741,15 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cpu, int level)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> + /*
>> + * must be before kvm_put_nested_state so that HF_SMM_MASK is set during
>> + * SMM.
>> + */
>> + ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(x86_cpu, level);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE) {
>> ret = kvm_put_nested_state(x86_cpu);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> @@ -4787,10 +4796,6 @@ int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cpu, int level)
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> return ret;
>> }
>> - ret = kvm_put_vcpu_events(x86_cpu, level);
>> - if (ret < 0) {
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> if (level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE) {
>> ret = kvm_put_mp_state(x86_cpu);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> --
>> 2.41.0
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-26 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-26 5:42 [PATCH] target/i386/kvm: call kvm_put_vcpu_events() before kvm_put_nested_state() Eiichi Tsukata
2023-10-26 5:49 ` Eiichi Tsukata
2023-10-26 5:52 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2023-10-26 8:52 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-11-01 2:09 ` Eiichi Tsukata
2023-11-01 14:04 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2023-11-08 1:12 ` Eiichi Tsukata
2024-01-16 0:13 ` Eiichi Tsukata
2024-01-16 9:31 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78ddc3c3-6cfa-b48c-5d73-903adec6ac4a@linaro.org \
--to=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=eiichi.tsukata@nutanix.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).