From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com>,
"Jon Doron" <arilou@gmail.com>
Cc: QEMU <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
qemu trival <qemu-trivial@nongnu.org>,
Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] dump: Set correct vaddr for ELF dump
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 19:04:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7961a154-f139-af73-613d-94b88bf95392@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+F1CJN=Gn5GYqrOeqWFNryw=q+7q8TDUX0VQEzrtS8tbUeQg@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/07/19 13:14, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 5:52 PM Jon Doron <arilou@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> vaddr needs to be equal to the paddr since the dump file represents the
>> physical memory image.
>>
>> Without setting vaddr correctly, GDB would load all the different memory
>> regions on top of each other to vaddr 0, thus making GDB showing the wrong
>> memory data for a given address.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Doron <arilou@gmail.com>
>
> This is a non-trivial patch! (qemu-trivial, please ignore).
>
>> ---
>> dump.c | 4 ++--
>> scripts/dump-guest-memory.py | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/dump.c b/dump.c
>> index 4ec94c5e25..bf77a119ea 100644
>> --- a/dump.c
>> +++ b/dump.c
>> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static void write_elf64_load(DumpState *s, MemoryMapping *memory_mapping,
>> phdr.p_paddr = cpu_to_dump64(s, memory_mapping->phys_addr);
>> phdr.p_filesz = cpu_to_dump64(s, filesz);
>> phdr.p_memsz = cpu_to_dump64(s, memory_mapping->length);
>> - phdr.p_vaddr = cpu_to_dump64(s, memory_mapping->virt_addr);
>> + phdr.p_vaddr = phdr.p_paddr;
>
> This is likely breaking paging=true somehow, which sets
> memory_mapping->virt_addr to non-0.
>
> According to doc "If you want to use gdb to process the core, please
> set @paging to true."
>
> Although I am not able to (gdb) x/10bx 0xa0000 for example on a core
> produced with paging. Not sure why, anybody could help?
>
>> assert(memory_mapping->length >= filesz);
>>
>> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static void write_elf32_load(DumpState *s, MemoryMapping *memory_mapping,
>> phdr.p_paddr = cpu_to_dump32(s, memory_mapping->phys_addr);
>> phdr.p_filesz = cpu_to_dump32(s, filesz);
>> phdr.p_memsz = cpu_to_dump32(s, memory_mapping->length);
>> - phdr.p_vaddr = cpu_to_dump32(s, memory_mapping->virt_addr);
>> + phdr.p_vaddr = phdr.p_paddr;
>>
>> assert(memory_mapping->length >= filesz);
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/dump-guest-memory.py b/scripts/dump-guest-memory.py
>> index 198cd0fe40..2c587cbefc 100644
>> --- a/scripts/dump-guest-memory.py
>> +++ b/scripts/dump-guest-memory.py
>> @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ class ELF(object):
>> phdr = get_arch_phdr(self.endianness, self.elfclass)
>> phdr.p_type = p_type
>> phdr.p_paddr = p_paddr
>> + phdr.p_vaddr = p_paddr
>
> With your proposed change though, I can dump memory with gdb...
>
>> phdr.p_filesz = p_size
>> phdr.p_memsz = p_size
>> self.segments.append(phdr)
>> --
>> 2.19.2
>>
>>
>
>
I've never used paging-enabled dumps. First, because doing so requires
QEMU to trust guest memory contents (see original commit 783e9b4826b9;
or more recently/generally, the @dump-guest-memory docs in
"qapi/misc.json"). Second, because whenever I had to deal with guest
memory dumps, I always used "crash" (which needs no paging), and the
subject guests were all Linux.
I can't comment on paging-enabled patches for dump, except that they
shouldn't regress the paging-disabled functionality. :) If the patches
satisfy that, I'm fine.
(I *am* surprised that GDB insists on p_vaddr equaling p_paddr; after
all, in the guest, the virtual address is "memory_mapping->virt_addr".
But, I would never claim to understand most of the ELF intricacies,
and/or what GDB requires on top of those.)
Thanks
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-07 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-25 12:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1] dump: Set correct vaddr for ELF dump Jon Doron
2019-01-07 12:14 ` Marc-André Lureau
2019-01-07 18:04 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-01-08 6:31 ` Jon Doron
2019-01-08 11:30 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7961a154-f139-af73-613d-94b88bf95392@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=arilou@gmail.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
--cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).