From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EFxhi-0003ec-8r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:39:22 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EFxhh-0003e8-49
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:39:21 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EFxhh-0003dy-1F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:39:21 -0400
Received: from [64.233.162.204] (helo=zproxy.gmail.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EFxhR-0003SU-NQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:39:05 -0400
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i11so347075nzh
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <79bf984805091510393f3dfecc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:39:04 -0700
From: Mike Swanson <mikeonthecomputer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu and AFS filesystem bugs?
In-Reply-To: <20050915140304.GR1685@kalmia.hozed.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050915030503.GQ1685@kalmia.hozed.org>
	<41e41e7a050914230040e0c17@mail.gmail.com>
	<20050915140304.GR1685@kalmia.hozed.org>
Reply-To: mikeonthecomputer@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 9/15/05, Troy Benjegerdes <hozer@hozed.org> wrote:
> I have had similiar problems with and without kqemu. Initially, I
> thought kqemu was causing the problem.
>=20
> What exactly does the win2k install hack do anyway? Does it change the
> disk emulation somehow?

There have been reports of problems with Windows 2000 thinking the
disk is full during installation. The hack modified the behaviour of
IDE emulation to workaround it for the time being. After Windows 2000
is installed, it's recommended that you do not use the option, as it
slows emulation speed down a lot, and Win2k is fine after installation
anyway.

--=20
Mike