From: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>,
mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] vhost_vdpa: no need to fetch vring base when poweroff
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 18:14:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a268b23-0832-8caf-f792-ee1b389d2b70@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEsnq0kKFKaT2V+QB28pU5GBSjpXA2i0BePV8qXgJTB4Xw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8253 bytes --]
On 7/12/2023 3:22 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 2:54 PM Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/11/2023 3:34 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 3:25 PM Eugenio Perez Martin
>> <eperezma@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 9:05 AM Jason Wang
>> <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 12:09 PM Zhu, Lingshan
>> <lingshan.zhu@intel.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 7/11/2023 10:50 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 4:53 PM Zhu Lingshan
>> <lingshan.zhu@intel.com> wrote:
>> > > >> In the poweroff routine, no need to fetch last
>> available index.
>> > > >>
>> > > > This is because there's no concept of shutdown in the
>> vhost layer, it
>> > > > only knows start and stop.
>> > > >
>> > > >> This commit also provides a better debug message in
>> the vhost
>> > > >> caller vhost_virtqueue_stop,
>> > > > A separate patch is better.
>> > > OK
>> > > >
>> > > >> because if vhost does not fetch
>> > > >> the last avail idx successfully, maybe the device does not
>> > > >> suspend, vhost will sync last avail idx to vring used
>> idx as a
>> > > >> work around, not a failure.
>> > > > This only happens if we return a negative value?
>> > > Yes
>> > > >
>> > > >> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
>> > > >> ---
>> > > >> hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> > > >> hw/virtio/vhost.c | 2 +-
>> > > >> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
>> b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
>> > > >> index 3c575a9a6e..10b445f64e 100644
>> > > >> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
>> > > >> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c
>> > > >> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>> > > >> #include "cpu.h"
>> > > >> #include "trace.h"
>> > > >> #include "qapi/error.h"
>> > > >> +#include "sysemu/runstate.h"
>> > > >>
>> > > >> /*
>> > > >> * Return one past the end of the end of section. Be
>> careful with uint64_t
>> > > >> @@ -1391,6 +1392,15 @@ static int
>> vhost_vdpa_get_vring_base(struct vhost_dev *dev,
>> > > >> struct vhost_vdpa *v = dev->opaque;
>> > > >> int ret;
>> > > >>
>> > > >> + if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_SHUTDOWN)) {
>> > > >> + /*
>> > > >> + * Some devices do not support this call
>> properly,
>> > > >> + * and we don't need to retrieve the indexes
>> > > >> + * if it is shutting down
>> > > >> + */
>> > > >> + return 0;
>> > > > Checking runstate in the vhost code seems like a layer
>> violation.
>> > > >
>> > > > What happens without this patch?
>> > > vhost tries to fetch vring base,
>> > > vhost_vdpa needs suspend the device before retrieving
>> last_avail_idx.
>> > > However not all devices can support .suspend properly so
>> this call
>> > > may fail.
>> >
>> > I think this is where I'm lost. If the device doesn't support
>> > suspending, any reason we only try to fix the case of shutdown?
>> >
>> > Btw, the fail is intended:
>> >
>> > if (!v->suspended) {
>> > /*
>> > * Cannot trust in value returned by device, let
>> vhost recover used
>> > * idx from guest.
>> > */
>> > return -1;
>> > }
>> >
>>
>> The fail is intended, but to recover the last used idx,
>> either from
>> device or from the guest, is only useful in the case of
>> migration.
>>
>>
>> Note that we had userspace devices like VDUSE now, so it could be
>> useful in the case of a VDUSE daemon crash or reconnect.
> This code blcok is for vhost_vdpa backend, and I think vduse is
> another code path.
>
>
> I'm not sure I understand here, I meant vhost_vdpa + vduse. It works
> similar to vhost-user.
OK, so do you suggest we set vring state == 0 and return 0 if failed to
suspend the device?
No matter shutdown or other cases.
>
> Return a guest used idx may be a good idea but as Eugenio pointed
> out that may duplicate the code.
>>
>>
>> I think the main problem is the error message, actually. But
>> I think
>> it has no use either to recover last_avail_idx or print a debug
>> message if we're not migrating. Another solution would be to
>> recover
>> it from the guest at vhost_vdpa_get_vring_base, but I don't
>> like the
>> duplication.
>>
>> > And if we return to success here, will we go to set an
>> uninitialized
>> > last avail idx?
>> >
>>
>> It will be either the default value (is set to 0 at
>> __virtio_queue_reset) or the one received from a migration (at
>> virtio_load).
>>
>>
>> 0 is even sub-optimal than the index used. Anyhow, VHOST_DEBUG
>> should not be enabled for production environments.
> Returning 0 sounds like a queue reset, yes we can reset a queue if
> failed to suspend it, I am not sure whther
> 0 is better than guest used idx.
>
> I think we are not able to disable VHOST_DEBUG because customers
> can build QEMU by their own.
>
>
> Well, disabling debug information is a common practice in any
> distribution.
>
> Or if you worry about the default, let's have a patch to undef
> VHOST_DEBUG by defualt.
>
I can do this in the next version
Thanks
> Thanks
>
>
> Thanks
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> > r = dev->vhost_ops->vhost_get_vring_base(dev, &state);
>> > if (r < 0) {
>> > ...
>> > }.else {
>> > virtio_queue_set_last_avail_idx(vdev, idx, state.num);
>> > }
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > > Then vhost will print an error shows something failed.
>> > >
>> > > The error msg is confused, as stated in the commit log,
>> restoring
>> > > last_avail_idx with guest used idx
>> > > is a workaround rather than a failure. And no needs to
>> fetch last_avail_idx
>> > > when power off.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks
>> > > >
>> > > >> + }
>> > > >> +
>> > > >> if (v->shadow_vqs_enabled) {
>> > > >> ring->num =
>> virtio_queue_get_last_avail_idx(dev->vdev, ring->index);
>> > > >> return 0;
>> > > >> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost.c b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
>> > > >> index 82394331bf..7dd90cff3a 100644
>> > > >> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost.c
>> > > >> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost.c
>> > > >> @@ -1262,7 +1262,7 @@ void vhost_virtqueue_stop(struct
>> vhost_dev *dev,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> r = dev->vhost_ops->vhost_get_vring_base(dev,
>> &state);
>> > > >> if (r < 0) {
>> > > >> - VHOST_OPS_DEBUG(r, "vhost VQ %u ring restore
>> failed: %d", idx, r);
>> > > >> + VHOST_OPS_DEBUG(r, "sync last avail idx to
>> the guest used idx for vhost VQ %u", idx);
>> > > >> /* Connection to the backend is broken, so
>> let's sync internal
>> > > >> * last avail idx to the device used idx.
>> > > >> */
>> > > >> --
>> > > >> 2.39.3
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 19742 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-12 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-10 16:53 [PATCH V2] vhost_vdpa: no need to fetch vring base when poweroff Zhu Lingshan
2023-07-10 9:21 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-07-11 2:50 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-11 4:09 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-07-11 7:05 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-11 7:24 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-07-11 7:34 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-12 6:54 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2023-07-12 7:22 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-12 10:14 ` Zhu, Lingshan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a268b23-0832-8caf-f792-ee1b389d2b70@intel.com \
--to=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).