From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org
Cc: mst@redhat.com, ppandit@redhat.com, liq3ea@163.com,
liq3ea@gmail.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 for 3.1 1/4] net: drop too large packet early
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 10:18:15 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a639e00-105f-cf6d-5198-9c6e022bf29d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181203100608.28538-2-jasowang@redhat.com>
On 12/3/18 4:06 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> We try to detect and drop too large packet (>INT_MAX) in 1592a9947036
> ("net: ignore packet size greater than INT_MAX") during packet
> delivering. Unfortunately, this is not sufficient as we may hit
> another integer overflow when trying to queue such large packet in
> qemu_net_queue_append_iov():
>
> - size of the allocation may overflow on 32bit
> - packet->size is integer which may overflow even on 64bit
>
> Fixing this by move the check to qemu_sendv_packet_async() which is
s/move/moving/
> the entrance of all networking codes and reduce the limit to
> NET_BUFSIZE to be more conservative.
Please mention commit 1592a994 in the commit message (since you are
effectively reverting that with this as its replacement), and if this is
(as I suspect) an additional patch required for the complete fix to
CVE-2018-10839, also mention that.
>
> Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> Cc: Li Qiang <liq3ea@163.com>
> Reported-by: Li Qiang <liq3ea@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Li Qiang <liq3ea@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/net.c | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/net.c b/net/net.c
> index 07c194a8f6..affe1877cf 100644
> --- a/net/net.c
> +++ b/net/net.c
> @@ -712,15 +712,11 @@ ssize_t qemu_deliver_packet_iov(NetClientState *sender,
> void *opaque)
> {
> NetClientState *nc = opaque;
> - size_t size = iov_size(iov, iovcnt);
> int ret;
>
> - if (size > INT_MAX) {
> - return size;
> - }
>
> if (nc->link_down) {
> - return size;
> + return iov_size(iov, iovcnt);
Reverts 1592a994, and...
> }
>
> if (nc->receive_disabled) {
> @@ -745,10 +741,15 @@ ssize_t qemu_sendv_packet_async(NetClientState *sender,
> NetPacketSent *sent_cb)
> {
> NetQueue *queue;
> + size_t size = iov_size(iov, iovcnt);
> int ret;
>
> + if (size > NET_BUFSIZE) {
> + return size;
> + }
...returns early for packets larger than 68k (a much smaller limit than
INT_MAX, which makes analysis for int overflow a lot easier) at a saner
point in the code. Returning a large value is weird, but auditing all
callers:
hw/net/virtio-net.c: ret =
qemu_sendv_packet_async(qemu_get_subqueue(n->nic, queue_index),
- only checks if ret is 0 (returns -EBUSY) or not (assumes packet was
sent)
net/netmap.c: iovsize = qemu_sendv_packet_async(&s->nc, s->iov,
iovcnt,
- only checks if ret is 0 (starts polling) or not (assumes packet was
sent)
net/net.c: return qemu_sendv_packet_async(nc, iov, iovcnt, NULL);
- implementation of qemu_sendv_packet() - so we have to audit those
callers as well:
hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c: qemu_sendv_packet(nc, iov, iov_cnt);
hw/net/rocker/rocker_fp.c: qemu_sendv_packet(nc, iov, iovcnt);
hw/net/rtl8139.c: qemu_sendv_packet(qemu_get_queue(s->nic),
iov, 3);
net/hub.c: qemu_sendv_packet(&port->nc, iov, iovcnt);
- all four of these do not check the return status
So, it looks like none of the callers cares if the return value is
overlarge (no further math on the values), just that it is non-zero
(where the callers then presumably assume the packet was sent).
However, I am not familiar enough with the code to know if skipping the
packet by returning a non-zero value is going to have knock-on effects -
that is, my audit shows what the callers do, but not whether it was sane.
> +
> if (sender->link_down || !sender->peer) {
> - return iov_size(iov, iovcnt);
> + return size;
> }
If this is indeed CVE fixing, then we want it in -rc4, but I don't know
if the patch is correctly secure yet without answers to my questions.
Especially on a CVE fix for -rc4, you want to make the reviewer's life
as easy as possible by providing a commit message that includes enough
details to make analysis easy.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-03 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-03 10:06 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 for 3.1 0/4] Fix possible OOB during queuing packets Jason Wang
2018-12-03 10:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 for 3.1 1/4] net: drop too large packet early Jason Wang
2018-12-03 16:18 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2018-12-04 2:52 ` Jason Wang
2018-12-03 18:13 ` Thomas Huth
2018-12-04 2:55 ` Jason Wang
2018-12-03 10:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 for 3.1 2/4] virtio-net-test: accept variable length argument in pci_test_start() Jason Wang
2018-12-03 16:25 ` Eric Blake
2018-12-03 18:18 ` Thomas Huth
2018-12-03 10:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 for 3.1 3/4] virtio-net-test: remove unused macro Jason Wang
2018-12-03 16:26 ` Eric Blake
2018-12-03 10:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 for 3.1 4/4] virtio-net-test: add large tx buffer test Jason Wang
2018-12-03 16:46 ` Eric Blake
2018-12-04 2:52 ` Jason Wang
2018-12-03 16:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 for 3.1 0/4] Fix possible OOB during queuing packets Peter Maydell
2018-12-04 2:28 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a639e00-105f-cf6d-5198-9c6e022bf29d@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=liq3ea@163.com \
--cc=liq3ea@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).