From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/socket-helpers: Only fail socket protocol check if it is really necessary
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 13:27:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a78c69d-28f4-e73b-4acc-fc8dd923db3e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200908110715.GF899163@redhat.com>
On 08/09/2020 13.07, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:54:35PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> The tests/test-char test is currently always failing on my system since
>> socket_can_bind_connect("::1", PF_INET6) fails with EINVAL and thus
>> socket_check_protocol_support() is returning -1 for an error. But IPv4
>> is working fine. The logic in socket_check_protocol_support() seems to
>> be wrong here, if either IPv6 or IPv4 is working, we should not return
>> an error here. Thus rework the function to only return errors if both
>> checks failed.
>
> Can you tell me which exact syscall is giving EINVAL in this scenario ?
getaddrinfo() fails with -2 (EAI_NONAME ?). The logic in
socket_can_bind_connect() then translates this into EINVAL.
[...]
>> - if (socket_can_bind_connect("::1", PF_INET6) < 0) {
>> - if (errno != EADDRNOTAVAIL) {
>> - return -1;
>> - }
>> - } else {
>> - *has_ipv6 = true;
>> + errv6 = socket_can_bind_connect("::1", PF_INET6);
>> + *has_ipv6 = (errv6 == 0);
>> +
>> + if (!*has_ipv4 && !*has_ipv6 &&
>> + (errv4 != EADDRNOTAVAIL || errv6 != EADDRNOTAVAIL)) {
>> + return -1;
>> }
>
> The return value of socket_can_bind_connect is either 0 or -1,
> but you're treating it an errno which isn't right.
Uh, where's my brown paperbag? ... looks like I need more coffee today...
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-08 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-08 10:54 [PATCH] tests/socket-helpers: Only fail socket protocol check if it is really necessary Thomas Huth
2020-09-08 11:07 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-09-08 11:27 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2020-09-08 11:41 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a78c69d-28f4-e73b-4acc-fc8dd923db3e@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).