From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjWN5-0006rK-Ua for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 14:26:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjWN1-0007Gd-RT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 14:26:39 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjWN1-0007GM-IV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 14:26:35 -0500 References: <1488472983-9108-1-git-send-email-felipe@nutanix.com> <148847375468.285.999031041241417996@0e2666bad730> From: Eric Blake Message-ID: <7aed6281-a647-78bd-3d39-233ca50d8f71@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 13:26:25 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Mr58deMkxkujULRB3UX9VOwMi7CtMJ6NF" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] Introduce vhost-user-scsi and sample application List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Felipe Franciosi Cc: "famz@redhat.com" , "mst@redhat.com" , "stefanha@redhat.com" , "marcandre.lureau@redhat.com" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Mr58deMkxkujULRB3UX9VOwMi7CtMJ6NF From: Eric Blake To: Felipe Franciosi Cc: "famz@redhat.com" , "mst@redhat.com" , "stefanha@redhat.com" , "marcandre.lureau@redhat.com" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Message-ID: <7aed6281-a647-78bd-3d39-233ca50d8f71@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/3] Introduce vhost-user-scsi and sample application References: <1488472983-9108-1-git-send-email-felipe@nutanix.com> <148847375468.285.999031041241417996@0e2666bad730> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/02/2017 11:01 AM, Felipe Franciosi wrote: > Hi Eric, >=20 > Ping on this? > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/msg06169.html >=20 [context: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] compiler: add ignore_value() macro= ] I'm still in favor of the patch, but only when it has a client. And I'm not sure who the maintainer is for the 2/2 of that series. But the easiest way to get ignore_value() added to the source tree is to (re-)submit it as part of a series that uses it. It's okay for more than one patch series to start with a common patch prefix. For this particular thread, Dan pointed out a nice way to sidestep ignore_value(), so that doesn't help much on the ping'd patch. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --Mr58deMkxkujULRB3UX9VOwMi7CtMJ6NF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYuHHhAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqLMYIAIck/wat4AAnATsDJgvrxoiB WzdF1Qo10NVruDieL58GIyE3EE7VALudiLlSytJBScJQUgcYWIcB6nXmtYqZFmGG Nbi22N/Vj/Jk6wcpHeEhpas57JUK6298wzCmP7jU1yL2R8b9qX63MYe2kDu1CDuR CdHeVz5Gye1VxdeV1AWFgo+69EtRFiFFRacMRJUTvr6MGtZ1YB1H05YrZKo9vr+h Rc5ntSgRR4qXd9+zsUArAPjzaAZfGye4HSsrB3sX9RK7bZdRJ0paiXGD1r4X8wph kBDu6Ljzrn6QHrZ3xaIiC7b9F6vHgsYnyokHvDM82vfyp+/XX/aP7qSUlEntDlw= =4wIa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Mr58deMkxkujULRB3UX9VOwMi7CtMJ6NF--