From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/s390x/sclp: Mark the sclp device with user_creatable = false
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 19:06:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b42b017-e216-854f-a4a1-4393811cb69f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3bebf28-76e6-5a4c-3a4c-34b940f85fb9@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 04.10.2017 17:18, Pierre Morel wrote:
> On 04/10/2017 15:53, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> The "sclp" device is just an internal device that can not be instantiated
>> by the users. If they try to use it, they only get a simple error
>> message:
>>
>> $ qemu-system-s390x -nographic -device sclp
>> qemu-system-s390x: Option '-device s390-sclp-event-facility' cannot be
>> handled by this machine
>>
>> Since sclp_init() tries to create a TYPE_SCLP_EVENT_FACILITY which is
>> a non-pluggable sysbus device, there is really no way that the "sclp"
>> device can be used by the user, so let's set the user_creatable = false
>> accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> hw/s390x/sclp.c | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390x/sclp.c b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>> index 30aefbf..9be0cb8 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390x/sclp.c
>> @@ -606,6 +606,11 @@ static void sclp_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void
>> *data)
>> dc->realize = sclp_realize;
>> dc->hotpluggable = false;
>> set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_MISC, dc->categories);
>> + /*
>> + * Reason: Creates TYPE_SCLP_EVENT_FACILITY in sclp_init
>> + * which is a non-pluggable sysbus device
>> + */
>> + dc->user_creatable = false;
>>
>> sc->read_SCP_info = read_SCP_info;
>> sc->read_storage_element0_info = read_storage_element0_info;
>>
>
> I must miss something.
> Why is the sclp device not a SYS_BUS_DEVICE ?
> The problem seems to come from the heterogeneity of the sclp and sclp
> generated devices.
I wonder whether it should rather be the other way round: Why is
TYPE_SCLP_EVENT_FACILITY a sysbus device? Sysbus is an abstraction for
simple on-board devices, while TYPE_SCLP_EVENT_FACILITY seems rather to
be a pseudo-device... so it should rather simply be of TYPE_DEVICE
instead? Or do I miss something?
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-04 13:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/s390x/sclp: Mark the sclp device with user_creatable = false Thomas Huth
2017-10-04 14:00 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2017-10-04 14:22 ` Farhan Ali
2017-10-04 14:56 ` Halil Pasic
2017-10-04 15:18 ` Pierre Morel
2017-10-04 15:42 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-10-04 17:06 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2017-10-05 8:14 ` Cornelia Huck
2017-10-05 8:04 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7b42b017-e216-854f-a4a1-4393811cb69f@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).