From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52719) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gROVZ-0008FO-EN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:33:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gROVY-0006mz-PR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:33:33 -0500 Sender: Richard Henderson References: <1543226303-5260-1-git-send-email-liq3ea@gmail.com> <87mupw3vm2.fsf@linaro.org> <733cd094-3775-ba2f-242d-e58bc7f2daaa@redhat.com> From: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <7b4d2a9a-a4ed-1f12-f1f6-e5db1d5bd704@twiddle.net> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 13:33:17 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <733cd094-3775-ba2f-242d-e58bc7f2daaa@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target: hax: fix a typo List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Li Qiang Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, laurent@vivier.eu, pbonzini@redhat.com On 11/26/18 1:25 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> - * 1. The hax_tunnel is also destroied when vcpu destroy >>> + * 1. The hax_tunnel is also destroyed when vcpu destroy > I'm not native english speaker. Isn't it: > > 'The hax_tunnel is also destroyed at vcpu destroy' > > or > > 'The hax_tunnel is also destroyed when vcpu is destroyed'? This second option is best, fwiw. r~