Re: [Qemu-devel] Proposal for 2.9 release schedule

[Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>]

On 09/01/2017 12:11, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 January 2017 at 10:41, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 03:12:28PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 4 January 2017 at 14:51, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 05:06:13PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> On 03/01/2017 16:53, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 03:15:58PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>>>> Considering that Easter is on April 16th, we'd probably want to have the
>>>>>>> release before that date even in case of a slip.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On the other hand, the Christmas / New Year break here means that we'll
>>>>>>> have to make the development time 1-2 week shorter in practice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2016-02-21     2.9 soft freeze
>>>>>>> 2016-03-07     hard freeze / rc0
>>>>>>> 2016-03-28     rc3 (+3 weeks)
>>>>>>> 2016-04-04     rc4 or release
>>>>>>> 2016-04-11     release (if rc4)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One possibility is to make soft freeze happen a few days later.
>>>>>>> Peter/Stefan, how did the experiment go with the new rules for soft
>>>>>>> freeze?  Is it worth repeating it for 2.9 and would it make sense to
>>>>>>> shorten soft freeze given the new rules?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would shorten the soft freeze by 1 week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Overall the 2.8 release went smoothly.  We got unlucky right at the end
>>>>>> with a release blocker but otherwise it was fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then what about soft freeze on 2016-02-28?
>>>>
>>>> Sounds good to me.  Peter?
>>>
>>> Are we retaining the "make sure you have your pull requests on the list
>>> by the softfreeze date" rule this time around?
>>
>> I hope so.  It helps keep the freeze time bounded.
> 
> OK. The dates above work ok for me, so I've updated the wiki:
> http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.9
> 
> If we're going to standardize on the new softfreeze definition we should
> update http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/SoftFeatureFreeze I guess.

Done, any help with the wording is welcome of course.

Paolo