From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Daniele Buono <dbuono@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci.yml: Add jobs to test CFI flags
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:28:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d5cce9f-e567-274b-857f-e046dd124979@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8a6d3be-727e-9006-e6f8-c80c918d8caa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 24/02/21 18:55, Daniele Buono wrote:
>>
>> Does it make sense to test only one target instead?
>
> I'd prefer grouping multiple targets per job so that the number of jobs doesn't explode, and stopping ninja from linking in parallel does solve the issue.
Yeah, backend_max_links should do it. The 3 hour timeout scared me.
>> Can you explain what you mean, and perhaps add a check or warning for
>> incompatible settings?
>
> Certainly. The issue here is that there is a function in libslirp that
> is used as callbacks for QEMU Timers: ra_timer_handler
> (There may be others, but of this one I'm sure because I traced it).
>
> This is not an issue when you compile slirp with qemu, since the whole
> library now has CFI informations and is statically linked in the QEMU
> binary. It becomes an issue if you are dynamically linking a system-wide
> libslirp, as it happens on Fedora.
>
> I'd be happy to add a check on configure/meson that ends the configure
> step with an error when this happens, but that would technically be an
> independent patch that I'd work on in parallel to this one.
> I would prefer to not automatically select the git-based libslirp
> because that may go unnoticed when configuring.
Sounds good. For now just add a comment, please.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-24 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-22 23:01 [PATCH 0/2] gitlab-ci.yml: Add jobs to test CFI Daniele Buono
2021-02-22 23:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] gitlab-ci.yml: Allow custom make parallelism Daniele Buono
2021-02-23 8:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-23 19:34 ` Daniele Buono
2021-02-24 7:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-24 18:02 ` Daniele Buono
2021-02-23 15:03 ` Wainer dos Santos Moschetta
2021-02-22 23:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci.yml: Add jobs to test CFI flags Daniele Buono
2021-02-23 8:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-24 17:55 ` Daniele Buono
2021-02-24 18:28 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7d5cce9f-e567-274b-857f-e046dd124979@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=dbuono@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).