From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D73C4338F for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 05:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DAB760EE2 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 05:54:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 2DAB760EE2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:41322 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDhCN-0000U2-Lf for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 01:54:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60766) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDhBf-00081z-9a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 01:53:59 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:41934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDhBa-0008AC-5F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 01:53:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1628661232; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rDBXC2sfwDcS6hnusKwTLKV3As4FpJ+9vBQFeX1UrFg=; b=Ebqm4sCAFHExLnf+jlOJyoJGNjFpPuaUpL5WY+AuYefH/3/sbmUrOu3sY1pQ2YzxFvTO/s 0odqFbt22VxDtJu4YpYl83FE6FxZIlbCVMNmgHIZnRsvhr+ZfHuyoEfYJ1Rg2AllQtksJ4 xW99xS3jMe37XE8CyXxjnw4Z0pmrscM= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-601-oQBX9B8GN-K-bInGihIb7Q-1; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 01:53:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: oQBX9B8GN-K-bInGihIb7Q-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id m5-20020a5d6a050000b0290154e83dce73so317910wru.19 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 22:53:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rDBXC2sfwDcS6hnusKwTLKV3As4FpJ+9vBQFeX1UrFg=; b=Ubu8mqAL0keMMf36itY61I3AUDBU3K2hxCMiiHNZhf0UzVkAyJddFNGEVl0Q/mXSUZ er+ax31IHn5tzErE5QN89m8Y3Iwugqv3uFlJEiAh29QotosLqcarqZUMS6UCbSAncilg HdPWLj2V8Ikt6whuHFzTjybl9kiMQ5iY6H0mMH75HcNuh7+0zTXVp/VCRKURTbfJSoJB mteHZaiC8JL0XCY6tm59QgeoorTLXL8JL5Z4mnAVQ4SkEK7FKwgfFY2/IYBZo8MB2aOS /w7SmPDp5ezz1dzqR2/DxHpGP3jXGY5bE/NqxFKicR4lULry+8uioReGMlXs5Gac8J8t pX6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533t6HX8+F5420hQopOSprco9cf1Nou8YAI9vONcn7WEFhvSYwP4 ZlY//rF2EPQqWBed0HbbuQOi0ks8HOp6uYKcUw3B7kjVZtLzcViOsgr5X6PLDf1DNBEiAs5nYDZ vWi7XSfBq3WuHECY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c89:: with SMTP id k9mr25778149wms.78.1628661227454; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 22:53:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzs5n/8ZLlbZNMP3SrNsQ4EdBqJaQSwRJK+3XKIzecTbIP/7+XB0+K/Q8ohihBYgD0y/wt+vw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c89:: with SMTP id k9mr25778133wms.78.1628661227266; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 22:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thuth.remote.csb (nat-pool-str-t.redhat.com. [149.14.88.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l9sm25353684wro.92.2021.08.10.22.53.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 22:53:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gitlab: avoid timeouts in windows cross builds To: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <20210810140653.3969823-1-berrange@redhat.com> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: <7dd14df7-8dea-93b1-3f3a-6b93b527ed2d@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 07:53:45 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210810140653.3969823-1-berrange@redhat.com> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=thuth@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.704, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Willian Rampazzo , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , Wainer dos Santos Moschetta Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 10/08/2021 16.06, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > The win64 cross build is quite often hitting the job timeout, despite > having an elevated timeout of 80 minutes. A typical time is 75-78 > minutes in my tests, which leaves little headroom. > > I'm not inclined to increase the timeout beyond 80 minutes as this is > already unreasonably long. > > Interestingly the win32 job doesn't timeout in the same way. In local > tests I've found the mingw32 gcc is as much as 50% faster than > mingw64 gcc in building QEMU. This explains at least why we only see > win64 gitlab builds timeout normally. I've had similar experiences in the past, and once even already sent a patch: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/patch/20210414081907.871437-4-thuth@redhat.com/ But your apprach is looking way nicer, indeed! Queued to my testing-next branch now: https://gitlab.com/thuth/qemu/-/commits/testing-next/ Thanks, Thomas