From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4255CC433DB for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BC8664DA3 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:48:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8BC8664DA3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:57830 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4sg5-0006lF-ED for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:48:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4sdq-0004dE-63 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:46:22 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:57643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l4sdn-0003XX-SE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:46:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1611783978; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3znq+LpxjXa8s0wfUA9w+Wuii4ZpDYvkb0RNpOfa4i4=; b=Fw7TQNX9ytvZms39FRJUR3CsqSrgzroV4dNBJzu/F+Dv67Oc75ZU6PI7jT3fboSndj7EMm nF5YVRI5K7AFkHb0iQMW+t7VaKbTXsJJUhlMhTEd8QHMx8UDL10y21TI6xG+w/Vqd1hamk S5TaTr1uCqYLZ8UzTgaVApa15QkoOes= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-321-HE86LXOyPXehVbVlK972ow-1; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:46:17 -0500 X-MC-Unique: HE86LXOyPXehVbVlK972ow-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id x12so1914023wrw.21 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:46:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3znq+LpxjXa8s0wfUA9w+Wuii4ZpDYvkb0RNpOfa4i4=; b=j8B/uesKqDM5MZUn2bhPBslJx1H5LQCrKz9eC7tqayAJFx5KE2K4qxsFFOSaekN8Gl qq243XWPzYu2DLH2SFsJSfJeHdWRsDHLOg420OckrTPtxTwN5CT5kaizNVAxkBhN9cxo 413MRtGYroeJ+8AgIYZbfyY5saB86WuTmm86wqR3QW2/1Ze6eZkDiqLitA468C76fYpI ZgKPJslOQNrA8lQRf6kMGHaSG29y4K/GukYbgHaIdJRbqoFDCHArPlyNXjS7ELGqKtne fBIDRzrnlbYjPCFcIaJ3Ni9jEviJpcXiFh9xTq9gxemzR1ko8ebydcisgxQEml6DSsqR 7xsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531gSOrgqMwBqL5gZUHU2qKtzZFbMiFLwJvWHtZuLl2OoQp/zEDT SITHOrXN4k6hY2nLwU240lggq824LNmeVGVtJhj7Q0/6hY01L43ufw9ZtaroOCJbxUfTUHMex6E dI2xNNlbfZn56gVA= X-Received: by 2002:adf:9427:: with SMTP id 36mr13193013wrq.271.1611783975829; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:46:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJynWfoM96oSJjkxx4ki0Oo4/n7DxxS9A2zqTUHym+EdyibP4q1nO+i0rtEgD1rifPMzJCcjuw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:9427:: with SMTP id 36mr13193000wrq.271.1611783975673; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:46:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.36] (13.red-83-57-169.dynamicip.rima-tde.net. [83.57.169.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u10sm3529165wmj.40.2021.01.27.13.46.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:46:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RFC] Change default ipv6 network from fec0/10 (site local) to fe80/10 (link local) To: Doug Evans , QEMU Developers References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: <7e80b14a-e749-c5a4-69e1-83239f2ee5b1@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:46:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=philmd@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=philmd@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.308, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, Samuel Thibault , Jason Wang , "Daniel P. Berrange" Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Hi Doug, Cc'ing more developers. On 1/27/21 8:13 PM, Doug Evans wrote: > Hi. > > This is just an information gathering question. I don't know enough to > formally propose the change. > I happened to notice QEMU's default for the ipv6 network is fec0::/10 > which is deprecated (RFC3879). > I think(!) an obvious replacement is fe80::/10, link local. > > Has anyone thought about this issue or know of reasons why we shouldn't > make this change? I'm a bit worried this could break various scripts and firewall rules where this is the expected default range...