From: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
To: John Levon <john.levon@nutanix.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, "Jason Herne" <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>,
"Tomita Moeko" <tomitamoeko@gmail.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Matthew Rosato" <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
"Eric Farman" <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Stefano Garzarella" <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Halil Pasic" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/15] vfio: add vfio_device_get_irq_info() helper
Date: Thu, 1 May 2025 07:53:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e94c3cf-1295-4b67-b59f-837f36011ff3@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250430194003.2793823-5-john.levon@nutanix.com>
On 4/30/25 3:39 PM, John Levon wrote:
> Add a helper similar to vfio_device_get_region_info() and use it
> everywhere.
>
> Replace a couple of needless allocations with stack variables.
>
> As a side-effect, this fixes a minor error reporting issue in the call
> from vfio_msix_early_setup().
>
> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Levon <john.levon@nutanix.com>
> ---
> hw/vfio/ap.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> hw/vfio/ccw.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> hw/vfio/device.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> hw/vfio/pci.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
> hw/vfio/platform.c | 6 +++---
> include/hw/vfio/vfio-device.h | 3 +++
> 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/ap.c b/hw/vfio/ap.c
> index 4f88f80c54..4f97260dac 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/ap.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/ap.c
> @@ -139,10 +139,10 @@ static bool vfio_ap_register_irq_notifier(VFIOAPDevice *vapdev,
> unsigned int irq, Error **errp)
> {
> int fd;
> - size_t argsz;
> + int ret;
> IOHandler *fd_read;
> EventNotifier *notifier;
> - g_autofree struct vfio_irq_info *irq_info = NULL;
> + struct vfio_irq_info irq_info;
> VFIODevice *vdev = &vapdev->vdev;
>
> switch (irq) {
> @@ -165,14 +165,15 @@ static bool vfio_ap_register_irq_notifier(VFIOAPDevice *vapdev,
> return false;
> }
>
> - argsz = sizeof(*irq_info);
> - irq_info = g_malloc0(argsz);
> - irq_info->index = irq;
> - irq_info->argsz = argsz;
> + ret = vfio_device_get_irq_info(vdev, irq, &irq_info);
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "vfio: Error getting irq info");
> + return false;
> + }
>
> - if (ioctl(vdev->fd, VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO,
> - irq_info) < 0 || irq_info->count < 1) {
> - error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "vfio: Error getting irq info");
> + if (irq_info.count < 1) {
> + error_setg(errp, "vfio: Error getting irq info, count=0");
> return false;
> }
The changes above look good to me.
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/ccw.c b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> index fde0c3fbef..ab3fabf991 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> @@ -376,8 +376,8 @@ static bool vfio_ccw_register_irq_notifier(VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev,
> Error **errp)
> {
> VFIODevice *vdev = &vcdev->vdev;
> - g_autofree struct vfio_irq_info *irq_info = NULL;
> - size_t argsz;
> + struct vfio_irq_info irq_info;
> + int ret;
> int fd;
> EventNotifier *notifier;
> IOHandler *fd_read;
> @@ -406,13 +406,15 @@ static bool vfio_ccw_register_irq_notifier(VFIOCCWDevice *vcdev,
> return false;
> }
>
> - argsz = sizeof(*irq_info);
> - irq_info = g_malloc0(argsz);
> - irq_info->index = irq;
> - irq_info->argsz = argsz;
> - if (ioctl(vdev->fd, VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO,
> - irq_info) < 0 || irq_info->count < 1) {
> - error_setg_errno(errp, errno, "vfio: Error getting irq info");
> + ret = vfio_device_get_irq_info(vdev, irq, &irq_info);
> +
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "vfio: Error getting irq info");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (irq_info.count < 1) {
> + error_setg(errp, "vfio: Error getting irq info, count=0");
> return false;
> }
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/device.c b/hw/vfio/device.c
> index 9673b0717e..5d837092cb 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/device.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/device.c
> @@ -185,6 +185,21 @@ bool vfio_device_irq_set_signaling(VFIODevice *vbasedev, int index, int subindex
> return false;
> }
>
> +int vfio_device_get_irq_info(VFIODevice *vbasedev, int index,
> + struct vfio_irq_info *info)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
> +
> + info->argsz = sizeof(*info);
> + info->index = index;
> +
> + ret = ioctl(vbasedev->fd, VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO, info);
> +
> + return ret < 0 ? -errno : ret;
> +}
> +
> int vfio_device_get_region_info(VFIODevice *vbasedev, int index,
> struct vfio_region_info **info)
> {
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> index 6908bcc0d3..407cf43387 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> @@ -1555,8 +1555,7 @@ static bool vfio_msix_early_setup(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp)
> uint16_t ctrl;
> uint32_t table, pba;
> int ret, fd = vdev->vbasedev.fd;
> - struct vfio_irq_info irq_info = { .argsz = sizeof(irq_info),
> - .index = VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX };
> + struct vfio_irq_info irq_info;
> VFIOMSIXInfo *msix;
>
> pos = pci_find_capability(&vdev->pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
> @@ -1593,7 +1592,8 @@ static bool vfio_msix_early_setup(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp)
> msix->pba_offset = pba & ~PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_BIRMASK;
> msix->entries = (ctrl & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_QSIZE) + 1;
>
> - ret = ioctl(vdev->vbasedev.fd, VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO, &irq_info);
> + ret = vfio_device_get_irq_info(&vdev->vbasedev, VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX,
> + &irq_info);
> if (ret < 0) {
> error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "failed to get MSI-X irq info");
> g_free(msix);
> @@ -2736,7 +2736,7 @@ static bool vfio_populate_device(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp)
> {
> VFIODevice *vbasedev = &vdev->vbasedev;
> g_autofree struct vfio_region_info *reg_info = NULL;
> - struct vfio_irq_info irq_info = { .argsz = sizeof(irq_info) };
> + struct vfio_irq_info irq_info;
> int i, ret = -1;
>
> /* Sanity check device */
> @@ -2797,12 +2797,10 @@ static bool vfio_populate_device(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, Error **errp)
> }
> }
>
> - irq_info.index = VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX;
> -
> - ret = ioctl(vdev->vbasedev.fd, VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO, &irq_info);
> + ret = vfio_device_get_irq_info(vbasedev, VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX, &irq_info);
> if (ret) {
> /* This can fail for an old kernel or legacy PCI dev */
> - trace_vfio_populate_device_get_irq_info_failure(strerror(errno));
> + trace_vfio_populate_device_get_irq_info_failure(strerror(-ret));
> } else if (irq_info.count == 1) {
> vdev->pci_aer = true;
> } else {
> @@ -2911,17 +2909,18 @@ static void vfio_req_notifier_handler(void *opaque)
>
> static void vfio_register_req_notifier(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> {
> - struct vfio_irq_info irq_info = { .argsz = sizeof(irq_info),
> - .index = VFIO_PCI_REQ_IRQ_INDEX };
> + struct vfio_irq_info irq_info;
> Error *err = NULL;
> int32_t fd;
> + int ret;
>
> if (!(vdev->features & VFIO_FEATURE_ENABLE_REQ)) {
> return;
> }
>
> - if (ioctl(vdev->vbasedev.fd,
> - VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO, &irq_info) < 0 || irq_info.count < 1) {
> + ret = vfio_device_get_irq_info(&vdev->vbasedev, VFIO_PCI_REQ_IRQ_INDEX,
> + &irq_info);
> + if (ret < 0 || irq_info.count < 1) {
> return;
> }
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/platform.c b/hw/vfio/platform.c
> index ffb3681607..9a21f2e50a 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/platform.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/platform.c
> @@ -474,10 +474,10 @@ static bool vfio_populate_device(VFIODevice *vbasedev, Error **errp)
> QSIMPLEQ_INIT(&vdev->pending_intp_queue);
>
> for (i = 0; i < vbasedev->num_irqs; i++) {
> - struct vfio_irq_info irq = { .argsz = sizeof(irq) };
> + struct vfio_irq_info irq;
> +
> + ret = vfio_device_get_irq_info(vbasedev, i, &irq);
>
> - irq.index = i;
> - ret = ioctl(vbasedev->fd, VFIO_DEVICE_GET_IRQ_INFO, &irq);
> if (ret) {
> error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "failed to get device irq info");
> goto irq_err;
> diff --git a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-device.h b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-device.h
> index 666a0b50b4..5b833868c9 100644
> --- a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-device.h
> +++ b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-device.h
> @@ -146,6 +146,9 @@ int vfio_device_get_region_info(VFIODevice *vbasedev, int index,
> int vfio_device_get_region_info_type(VFIODevice *vbasedev, uint32_t type,
> uint32_t subtype, struct vfio_region_info **info);
> bool vfio_device_has_region_cap(VFIODevice *vbasedev, int region, uint16_t cap_type);
> +
> +int vfio_device_get_irq_info(VFIODevice *vbasedev, int index,
> + struct vfio_irq_info *info);
> #endif
>
> /* Returns 0 on success, or a negative errno. */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-01 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-30 19:39 [PATCH v2 00/15] vfio: preparation for vfio-user John Levon
2025-04-30 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] vfio: add vfio_prepare_device() John Levon
2025-05-05 8:35 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-30 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] vfio: add vfio_unprepare_device() John Levon
2025-05-05 9:18 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-30 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] vfio: add vfio_attach_device_by_iommu_type() John Levon
2025-04-30 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] vfio: add vfio_device_get_irq_info() helper John Levon
2025-05-01 11:53 ` Anthony Krowiak [this message]
2025-05-05 9:19 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-05-06 11:38 ` John Levon
2025-05-06 12:27 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-05-06 12:35 ` John Levon
2025-04-30 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] vfio: consistently handle return value for helpers John Levon
2025-05-05 9:32 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-30 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] include/qemu: add strread/writeerror() John Levon
2025-05-05 9:37 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-30 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] vfio: add vfio_pci_config_space_read/write() John Levon
2025-05-05 9:45 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-30 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] vfio: add unmap_all flag to DMA unmap callback John Levon
2025-05-05 12:06 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-05-05 13:26 ` John Levon
2025-05-05 21:05 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-30 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] vfio: implement unmap all for DMA unmap callbacks John Levon
2025-05-05 11:28 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-05-07 11:47 ` John Levon
2025-04-30 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] vfio: add device IO ops vector John Levon
2025-05-05 12:21 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-05-06 10:01 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-30 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] vfio: add region info cache John Levon
2025-05-05 12:26 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-30 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] vfio: add read/write to device IO ops vector John Levon
2025-05-05 12:39 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-30 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] vfio: add vfio-pci-base class John Levon
2025-05-05 12:42 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-30 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] vfio/container: pass listener_begin/commit callbacks John Levon
2025-05-05 12:43 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-04-30 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] vfio/container: pass MemoryRegion to DMA operations John Levon
2025-05-05 12:46 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-05-07 13:58 ` John Levon
2025-05-09 10:28 ` Cédric Le Goater
2025-05-05 12:51 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] vfio: preparation for vfio-user Cédric Le Goater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e94c3cf-1295-4b67-b59f-837f36011ff3@linux.ibm.com \
--to=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.levon@nutanix.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=tomitamoeko@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).