qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
	mihajlov@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/1] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:28:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f2202c7-b9ed-d1c8-7b5c-e6b8871aa931@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1574935984-16910-1-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1601 bytes --]

On 11/28/19 11:13 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> A new proposition:
> I think it would be wise to fork directly from handle_instruction
> instead to accept per default all instructions with with secure
> instruction interception code.
> Just in case future firmware with older QEMU.
> 
> How ever I let three dors open.
> 
> 1) This patch accepts the all B2 instructions, mostly I/O.
> Some of the instructions will not work correctly for PV until patched.
> This should be fixed, and will be, in a separate patch.
> 
> 2) The same is true for DIAG instructions.
> 
> 3) Secure notifications are separated from secure instructions and
> normal instructions interception because this case is completely new.
> For B2 instructions we do not have to do anything this just informative.
> However, one information is of interrest, a notification that
> SIGP(STOP) is sent to stop the CPUs and terminate QEMU.

Pierre, I told you this morning that I don't want this and that you
should leave this untouched until I can explain my thoughts behind the
initial patch in a f2f.
Thomas' review of your change only confirmed my concerns about this patch.

This is the wrong patch at the wrong time, which creates noise and work
for other people. Please stop and work on something else.



> 
> 
> 
> Pierre Morel (1):
>   s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation
> 
>  hw/s390x/sclp.c         | 18 +++++++++++++
>  include/hw/s390x/sclp.h |  2 ++
>  target/s390x/kvm.c      | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-28 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-28 10:13 [PATCH v1 0/1] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Pierre Morel
2019-11-28 10:13 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] " Pierre Morel
2019-11-28 12:10   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 13:05     ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-28 12:28 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2019-11-28 13:15   ` [PATCH v1 0/1] " Pierre Morel
2019-11-28 23:09 ` no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7f2202c7-b9ed-d1c8-7b5c-e6b8871aa931@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).