From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] s390x/mmu: DAT table definition overhaul
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 10:07:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f46ba66-041e-9511-1aa4-67c618bc3f0c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c8c8539-742e-7960-1ba4-d5dc34a24a08@redhat.com>
On 26/09/2019 09.59, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 26.09.19 09:52, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 26/09/2019 09.38, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 26.09.19 09:35, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>> On 25/09/2019 14.52, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>> Let's use consitent names for the region/section/page table entries and
>>>>> for the macros to extract relevant parts from virtual address. Make them
>>>>> match the definitions in the PoP - e.g., how the televant bits are actually
>>>>
>>>> s/televant/relevant/
>>>>
>>>>> called.
>>>>>
>>>>> Introduce defines for all bits declared in the PoP. This will come in
>>>>> handy in follow-up patches.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> target/s390x/cpu.h | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>>>> target/s390x/mem_helper.c | 12 +++---
>>>>> target/s390x/mmu_helper.c | 37 ++++++++++---------
>>>>> 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>>>>> index 163dae13d7..e74a809257 100644
>>>>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
>>>>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>>>>> @@ -558,26 +558,63 @@ QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(SysIB) != 4096);
>>>>> #define ASCE_TYPE_SEGMENT 0x00 /* segment table type */
>>>>> #define ASCE_TABLE_LENGTH 0x03 /* region table length */
>>>>>
>>>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_ORIGIN (~0xfffULL) /* region/segment table origin */
>>>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_RO 0x200 /* region/segment protection bit */
>>>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_TF 0xc0 /* region/segment table offset */
>>>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_INV 0x20 /* invalid region table entry */
>>>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_TYPE_MASK 0x0c /* region/segment table type mask */
>>>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_TYPE_R1 0x0c /* region first table type */
>>>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_TYPE_R2 0x08 /* region second table type */
>>>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_TYPE_R3 0x04 /* region third table type */
>>>>> -#define REGION_ENTRY_LENGTH 0x03 /* region third length */
>>>>> -
>>>>> -#define SEGMENT_ENTRY_ORIGIN (~0x7ffULL) /* segment table origin */
>>>>> -#define SEGMENT_ENTRY_FC 0x400 /* format control */
>>>>> -#define SEGMENT_ENTRY_RO 0x200 /* page protection bit */
>>>>> -#define SEGMENT_ENTRY_INV 0x20 /* invalid segment table entry */
>>>>> -
>>>>> -#define VADDR_PX 0xff000 /* page index bits */
>>>>> -
>>>>> -#define PAGE_RO 0x200 /* HW read-only bit */
>>>>> -#define PAGE_INVALID 0x400 /* HW invalid bit */
>>>>> -#define PAGE_RES0 0x800 /* bit must be zero */
>>>>> +#define REGION_ENTRY_ORIGIN 0xfffffffffffff000ULL
>>>>> +#define REGION_ENTRY_P 0x0000000000000200ULL
>>>>> +#define REGION_ENTRY_TF 0x00000000000000c0ULL
>>>>> +#define REGION_ENTRY_I 0x0000000000000020ULL
>>>>> +#define REGION_ENTRY_TT 0x000000000000000cULL
>>>>> +#define REGION_ENTRY_TL 0x0000000000000003ULL
>>>>
>>>> Any chance that you could keep the comments after the definitions? I
>>>> think they are useful for people who are not 100% familiar with the DAT
>>>> on s390x.
>>>
>>> I thought about that, but do we expect people that don't have a clue
>>> about s390x DAT and don't compare the code against the PoP to understand
>>> our DAT translation just by comments on defines?
>>
>> I'm not sure that everybody is aware of the PoP ... maybe you could just
>> put a comment in front of the block a la:
>>
>> /*
>> * For details on the following definitions, see the "Dynamic Address
>> * Translation" section in chapter 3 of the "z/Architecture Principles
>> * of Operations - SA22-7832-11"
>> */
>>
>
> We also have the PSW/PGM/PER definitions in there without such a note.
> What about something generic as:
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> index e74a809257..690b94c8ea 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
> /*
> * S/390 virtual CPU header
> *
> + * For details on the s390x architecture and used definitions (e.g.,
> + * PSW, PER and DAT (Dynamic Address Translation)), please refer to
> + * the "z/Architecture Principles of Operations" - a.k.a. PoP.
> + *
Fine for me, too.
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-26 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-25 12:52 [PATCH v2 0/7] s390x/mmu: DAT translation rewrite David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] s390x/mmu: Drop debug logging from MMU code David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 13:28 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 19:11 ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] s390x/mmu: Move DAT protection handling out of mmu_translate_asce() David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 17:01 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 19:14 ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] s390x/mmu: Inject DAT exceptions from a single place David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 17:05 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 19:14 ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] s390x/mmu: Inject PGM_ADDRESSING on boguous table addresses David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 17:12 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 19:25 ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 19:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] s390x/mmu: Use TARGET_PAGE_MASK in mmu_translate_pte() David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 17:15 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-25 19:26 ` Richard Henderson
2019-09-25 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] s390x/mmu: DAT table definition overhaul David Hildenbrand
2019-09-26 7:35 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-26 7:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-26 7:52 ` Thomas Huth
2019-09-26 7:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-26 8:07 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2019-09-25 12:52 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] s390x/mmu: Convert to non-recursive page table walk David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7f46ba66-041e-9511-1aa4-67c618bc3f0c@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).