From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IOteL-0004LV-15 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:17:53 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IOteJ-0004LB-PW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:17:51 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IOteJ-0004L8-JZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:17:51 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.232]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IOsOy-0002CH-EF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 05:57:56 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c38so1626551wra for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 02:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7fac565a0708250257g5fc5326eqe827d4e8b8c49a61@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:57:53 +0200 From: "Alexey Eremenko" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RFC] SVM support In-Reply-To: <46CF6FEB.1080504@bellard.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46CC956B.2060002@suse.de> <46CF11B2.5070201@suse.de> <46CF6FEB.1080504@bellard.org> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Alexander Graf: Excuse me, but it is a bit unclear what you did. Several questions arise: a. Qemu now is able to emulate SVM on non-SVM old 32-bit processors ? -or- b. Qemu now is able to emulate SVM on SVM processors ? c. Qemu now is able to emulate SVM on VT processors ? d. How fast it works ? (theoretically, or benchmark results ) Anyway it's nice to hear about this feature. -- -Alexey Eremenko "Technologov"