From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZi52-0007fM-Ok for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:46:56 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZi52-0007ep-8J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:46:56 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51462 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZi51-0007ei-U9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:46:55 -0500 Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.152]:21986) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LZi51-0006Wx-JO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:46:55 -0500 Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 4so1659641yxp.82 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:46:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <499B0965.9020007@eu.citrix.com> References: <7fac565a0902150510y1fb01c6awd1dcc3b6e7b8232d@mail.gmail.com> <7fac565a0902150911u1ed66ef0gc55663d723c76ae4@mail.gmail.com> <4999407C.5040009@eu.citrix.com> <49995266.3050707@redhat.com> <4999913F.3040108@eu.citrix.com> <499AF87C.9090703@redhat.com> <499B0965.9020007@eu.citrix.com> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:46:53 +0000 Message-ID: <7fac565a0902180046r1c0070bdrbf0af9511493c22b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels From: Alexey Eremenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>> Do you see the problem only on X11 remote? >>> How bad is on vnc? >>> >> >> vnc regresses in exactly the same way. >> Well, in my experience both local X11 and VNC are fast in KVM-84. But remote X11/SDL performance plunged below usable levels. -- -Alexey Eromenko "Technologov"